No, we don't need it that to upgrade llvm, but I need to decide soon.
On Dec 5, 2011 10:16 AM, "Brooks Davis" <bro...@freebsd.org> wrote:
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 01:28:33AM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote:
I would like to hold off on any more disruptive changes to the tree
until we can get this release out the door. If that means devel/clang
needs to stay at its current value (and only clang-devel updated), then
We don't actually need to add a bsd.pure.mk to upgrade llvm. We would
need to complete the repocopy in ports/163030 and change the build and
run depends in lang/pure which would change the depends of the 12ish
ports involved. Similar changes are needed in a couple other ports.
I'll leave it up to portmgr to decide if that's too disruptive. IMO if
any change of this scope (an upgrade triggering less than dozen rebuilds,
mostly of ports that aren't widely used) should be approved, it should
be this one given our general toolchain focus.