9 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-portsRe: Plan to add a bsd.pure.mk| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Zhihao Yuan | Nov 10, 2011 11:02 am |  .mk |
| Ion-Mihai Tetcu | Nov 15, 2011 1:35 pm | |
| Zhihao Yuan | Nov 15, 2011 2:34 pm | |
| Zhihao Yuan | Dec 4, 2011 11:10 pm | |
| Mark Linimon | Dec 4, 2011 11:28 pm | |
| Zhihao Yuan | Dec 5, 2011 12:04 am | |
| Brooks Davis | Dec 5, 2011 8:14 am | |
| Zhihao Yuan | Dec 5, 2011 9:15 am | |
| Pav Lucistnik | Dec 5, 2011 9:20 am |
| Subject: | Re: Plan to add a bsd.pure.mk | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Zhihao Yuan (lich...@gmail.com) | |
| Date: | Dec 5, 2011 9:15:44 am | |
| List: | org.freebsd.freebsd-ports | |
No, we don't need it that to upgrade llvm, but I need to decide soon.
-- Zhihao Yuan On Dec 5, 2011 10:16 AM, "Brooks Davis" <bro...@freebsd.org> wrote:
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 01:28:33AM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote:
I would like to hold off on any more disruptive changes to the tree until we can get this release out the door. If that means devel/clang needs to stay at its current value (and only clang-devel updated), then that's fine.
We don't actually need to add a bsd.pure.mk to upgrade llvm. We would need to complete the repocopy in ports/163030 and change the build and run depends in lang/pure which would change the depends of the 12ish ports involved. Similar changes are needed in a couple other ports.
I'll leave it up to portmgr to decide if that's too disruptive. IMO if any change of this scope (an upgrade triggering less than dozen rebuilds, mostly of ports that aren't widely used) should be approved, it should be this one given our general toolchain focus.
-- Brooks
_______________________________________________ free...@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "free...@freebsd.org"