atom feed9 messages in at.iem.pd-listRe: [PD] [PD-announce] new polyphonic...
FromSent OnAttachments
Phil StoneSep 17, 2008 10:12 pm 
Frank BarknechtSep 17, 2008 11:25 pm 
Phil StoneSep 18, 2008 8:48 am 
Frank BarknechtSep 18, 2008 9:18 am 
Tim GlasgowSep 18, 2008 11:18 am 
chris clepperSep 18, 2008 2:17 pm 
Derek HolzerSep 18, 2008 2:19 pm 
Tim GlasgowSep 19, 2008 1:42 am 
Matt BarberSep 19, 2008 3:46 pm 
Subject:Re: [PD] [PD-announce] new polyphonic granular synthesizer for Pd
From:Frank Barknecht (fb@footils.org)
Date:Sep 18, 2008 9:18:18 am
List:at.iem.pd-list

Hallo, Phil Stone hat gesagt: // Phil Stone wrote:

That's an intriguing idea. I *do* like the pattern matching, but it's not necessary at the interior level of the synthesizers. I wonder what the performance differences are, if any, between [routeOSC] and [route]?

I guess, route may even be a bit faster as it just compares symbols and doesn't have to split any strings, but it's probably negligible.

It's tempting, because with your recent work towards a vanilla-ready filter, it's getting more likely that [svf~] could be replaced with something non-external, and then my synthesizers could be completely external-free.

I found some diagrams on the web for the svf filter e.g. http://www.earlevel.com/Digitalir%20Audio/StateVar.html so maybe with some tweaking a simple svf could be made with pure Pd, too.

(You know, Damian and I and others are on a "Pure Pd" trip ATM, as the Pd in the RJDJ project for smartphones - iPhone only ATM - doesn't load externals. It's also a great exercise.)

Ciao