atom feed108 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.search-wsRE: [search-ws] RE: A further role fo...
FromSent OnAttachments
58 earlier messages
LeVan,RalphDec 17, 2010 6:47 am 
Ray Denenberg, Library of CongressDec 17, 2010 7:34 am 
Ray Denenberg, Library of CongressDec 17, 2010 7:34 am 
LeVan,RalphDec 17, 2010 7:56 am 
LeVan,RalphDec 17, 2010 7:58 am 
LeVan,RalphDec 17, 2010 8:03 am 
Ray Denenberg, Library of CongressDec 17, 2010 8:27 am 
LeVan,RalphDec 17, 2010 8:50 am 
Hammond, TonyDec 17, 2010 10:39 am 
LeVan,RalphDec 17, 2010 10:57 am 
Hammond, TonyDec 17, 2010 11:09 am 
Ray Denenberg, Library of CongressDec 17, 2010 11:28 am 
LeVan,RalphDec 17, 2010 11:53 am 
Ray Denenberg, Library of CongressDec 17, 2010 1:06 pm 
LeVan,RalphDec 17, 2010 1:34 pm 
LeVan,RalphDec 17, 2010 1:43 pm 
Ray Denenberg, Library of CongressDec 17, 2010 1:59 pm 
LeVan,RalphDec 17, 2010 2:09 pm 
Ray Denenberg, Library of CongressDec 17, 2010 2:17 pm 
LeVan,RalphDec 17, 2010 2:27 pm 
LeVan,RalphDec 17, 2010 2:34 pm 
Ray Denenberg, Library of CongressDec 17, 2010 2:46 pm 
Hammond, TonyDec 20, 2010 12:23 am.doc
Hammond, TonyDec 20, 2010 12:31 am 
Hammond, TonyDec 20, 2010 12:54 am 
Hammond, TonyDec 20, 2010 1:51 am 
LeVan,RalphDec 20, 2010 6:27 am 
LeVan,RalphDec 20, 2010 6:39 am 
LeVan,RalphDec 20, 2010 6:41 am 
LeVan,RalphDec 20, 2010 6:43 am 
Hammond, TonyDec 20, 2010 8:14 am 
Ray Denenberg, Library of CongressDec 20, 2010 8:22 am 
LeVan,RalphDec 20, 2010 8:31 am 
Matthew DoveyDec 20, 2010 8:32 am 
Ray Denenberg, Library of CongressDec 20, 2010 11:14 am 
LeVan,RalphDec 20, 2010 11:31 am 
Ray Denenberg, Library of CongressDec 20, 2010 11:38 am 
Ray Denenberg, Library of CongressDec 20, 2010 11:52 am 
Matthew DoveyDec 20, 2010 12:14 pm 
LeVan,RalphDec 20, 2010 12:21 pm 
LeVan,RalphDec 20, 2010 12:29 pm 
Ray Denenberg, Library of CongressDec 20, 2010 12:31 pm 
LeVan,RalphDec 20, 2010 12:36 pm 
Matthew DoveyDec 20, 2010 12:37 pm 
LeVan,RalphDec 20, 2010 12:37 pm 
Ray Denenberg, Library of CongressDec 20, 2010 12:46 pm 
LeVan,RalphDec 20, 2010 12:53 pm 
Hammond, TonyDec 21, 2010 2:26 am 
LeVan,RalphDec 22, 2010 6:22 am 
LeVan,RalphDec 22, 2010 6:31 am 
Subject:RE: [search-ws] RE: A further role for queryn: Leading and trailing booleans
From:LeVan,Ralph (lev@oclc.org)
Date:Dec 22, 2010 6:31:31 am
List:org.oasis-open.lists.search-ws

I don't really understand what "omitted term 1" means. Does it mean the form has terms 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, .... and the user started with term2, and entered two terms so he ommitted term 1 (and he also omitted term 4 and term 5 ...) or does it mean something else?

Did you look at that form I pointed you at? Each field in the form corresponded to an index. The user might well only use the 7 and 50th term fields in that form and only the qt7 and qt50 terms would be sent. But, every one of those indexes would be sent in as well as every one of those Booleans.

In that case, you have a two term query, term 2 and term 3. And it's a bad query and should be failed. It's a bad query because either the first or last term must omit the boolean.

What piece of code is going to be responsible for omitting the Boolean? We're talking about the dumbest of dumb clients who only have the smarts to follow the rules for processing forms. It's up to the server to figure out how to interpret the mass of information it gets and turn it into a legitimate CQL query. (Which is easy to do, since the javascript in my form does exactly that.)

Ralph