6 messages in net.java.dev.visualvm.issuesRe: [Issue 2] New - Basic JMX coverage| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| jess_holle | Nov 6, 2007 12:02 pm | |
| Luis-Miguel Alventosa | Nov 6, 2007 2:52 pm | |
| lmalvent | Nov 6, 2007 3:00 pm | |
| jess_holle | Nov 6, 2007 3:08 pm | |
| thurka | Nov 6, 2007 10:50 pm | |
| lmalvent | Mar 12, 2008 2:55 am |
| Subject: | Re: [Issue 2] New - Basic JMX coverage | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Luis-Miguel Alventosa (Luis...@Sun.COM) | |
| Date: | Nov 6, 2007 2:52:46 pm | |
| List: | net.java.dev.visualvm.issues | |
Hi Jess,
FYI we are currently working on the integration of at least the MBeans tab into VisualVM for local and probably remote connections.
The remaining JConsole tabs could be added later on after some functionality overlapping issues have been resolved so we can have a much nicer integration between the two tools.
Regards, Luis-Miguel Alventosa JavaSE JMX/JConsole development team Sun Microsystems, Inc. http://blogs.sun.com/lmalventosa
jess_holle wrote:
https://visualvm.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2 Issue #|2 Summary|Basic JMX coverage Component|visualvm Version|current Platform|All OS/Version|All URL| Status|NEW Status whiteboard| Keywords| Resolution| Issue type|ENHANCEMENT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|code Assigned to|issues@visualvm Reported by|jess_holle
------- Additional comments from jess...@dev.java.net Tue Nov 6 20:02:43 +0000 2007 ------- There is currently no coverage of JMX functionality whatsoever.
There is *so* much that could be easily done here. jconsole could (and should) be put to shame.
In the near term, however, one should at the very least be able to launch jconsole for local processes running under the same user via a local connection. [Yes, I know this requires calling an internal Sun API to do solely via process id, but it would still be helpful.]