8 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-scsiAIC7902 SCSI aborted command| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Don Bowman | Aug 3, 2003 8:36 am | |
| Justin T. Gibbs | Aug 4, 2003 12:25 pm | |
| Don Bowman | Aug 4, 2003 1:09 pm | |
| Wilko Bulte | Aug 4, 2003 1:14 pm | |
| Justin T. Gibbs | Aug 4, 2003 1:15 pm | |
| Scott Long | Aug 4, 2003 1:26 pm | |
| Don Bowman | Aug 4, 2003 1:31 pm | |
| Don Bowman | Aug 4, 2003 1:37 pm |
| Subject: | AIC7902 SCSI aborted command | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Don Bowman (do...@sandvine.com) | |
| Date: | Aug 4, 2003 1:31:42 pm | |
| List: | org.freebsd.freebsd-scsi | |
From: Scott Long [mailto:sco...@freebsd.org] Wilko Bulte wrote:
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 04:10:15PM -0400, Don Bowman wrote:
From: Justin T. Gibbs [mailto:gib...@scsiguy.com]
need larger spacing). If your cable is shorter than this, you might consider trying something longer.
Me & my trusty ruler re-measured the cable, and straightened out, it is 10.4" tip to tail, which matches the spec. I was foolishly thinking of the folded length.
It isn't too folded I hope? In the sense that you sometimes find flatcables stashed in miniscule cutouts in cases etc. Not too good for signal integrity either.
Except in cases where you need to slip through a tight slot and only a flat cable will do, the new-fangled round u320 cables are superior to their flat counterparts.
Correct me if i'm wrong, but for a single device on a chain, they are equivalent. The round cable is really just the flat cable untwisted, and its got the same amount of flat length @ each end.
I can believe the round ones are better for several drives on a chain.
--don