atom feed20 messages in at.iem.pd-listRe: [PD] Dynamic generation of $0-inc...
FromSent OnAttachments
Luke Iannini (pd)Feb 7, 2007 6:54 pm 
Alexandre QuessyFeb 7, 2007 8:34 pm 
Chris McCormickFeb 7, 2007 9:11 pm.pd
Chris McCormickFeb 7, 2007 11:00 pm 
Luke Iannini (pd)Feb 7, 2007 11:15 pm 
Frank BarknechtFeb 7, 2007 11:23 pm 
Luke Iannini (pd)Feb 7, 2007 11:33 pm 
PatcoFeb 8, 2007 2:41 am 
Roman HaefeliFeb 8, 2007 2:44 am 
PatcoFeb 8, 2007 3:32 am 
Frank BarknechtFeb 8, 2007 4:35 am 
Roman HaefeliFeb 8, 2007 4:45 am 
SteffenFeb 8, 2007 5:20 am 
Roman HaefeliFeb 8, 2007 5:45 am 
Frank BarknechtFeb 8, 2007 5:57 am 
SteffenFeb 8, 2007 6:05 am 
Luke Iannini (pd)Feb 8, 2007 6:11 am 
hard offFeb 8, 2007 9:12 am 
Roman HaefeliFeb 8, 2007 1:31 pm 
hard offFeb 8, 2007 3:18 pm 
Subject:Re: [PD] Dynamic generation of $0-including objects?
From:Frank Barknecht (fb@footils.org)
Date:Feb 8, 2007 4:35:09 am
List:at.iem.pd-list

Hallo, Roman Haefeli hat gesagt: // Roman Haefeli wrote:

anyway, why do you want to have a litteral '$0' in the abstraction argument and not the value, that it represents, since it is actually the same? if i am not totally mistaken, this would only make sense, when you plan to save the patch with all the dynamically generated stuff, whereas saving dynamically generated stuff does not make sense at all, as far as i can see it. the only case i could think of, that would require litteral '$0's as abstraction arguments, would be, if you would use dynamic patching just as a quicker way of patching.

... which actually is a very sensible usecase!

Ciao