15 messages in com.canoo.lists.webtestRe: [Webtest] WebTest next release: s...
FromSent OnAttachments
Marc Guillemot16 Mar 2007 01:16 
Denis N. Antonioli20 Mar 2007 07:54 
Marc Guillemot20 Mar 2007 09:41 
Denis N. Antonioli20 Mar 2007 14:47 
John and Pip20 Mar 2007 15:12 
Michael Habbert21 Mar 2007 00:30 
Marc Guillemot21 Mar 2007 00:46 
Paul King21 Mar 2007 00:54 
Kappen, Thomas, TECON Terenci21 Mar 2007 01:48 
Michael Habbert21 Mar 2007 02:02 
Denis N. Antonioli21 Mar 2007 04:17 
Marc Guillemot21 Mar 2007 04:33 
Paul King21 Mar 2007 06:02 
Lisa Crispin21 Mar 2007 08:00 
Marc Guillemot13 Apr 2007 04:15 
Subject:Re: [Webtest] WebTest next release: scope and time?
From:Marc Guillemot (mgui@yahoo.fr)
Date:03/21/2007 12:46:47 AM
List:com.canoo.lists.webtest

Sorry Denis I overlooked the main part of your last post.

... Shouldn't major version be used for changes that have major (prositive or negative...) impacts for the end-user? Such as a change that could break existing script, as the migration to htmlunit was, or a change that brings new possibilities.

yes: in this case may positive changes

That way, I could as an end-user better decide if/when I want to upgrade the webtest version. A change to a minor version could be done pretty much anytime, whereas refactoring and testing amay have to be planned along with a change to a major version.

I would see the use of Ant 1.7, java 1.5, xpath 2.0 or successful XmlHttpRequest as possible reasons for a webtest 3.

XmlHttpRequest as it is already successfull ;-) The problems are located in other areas.

Which changes make this release worth of a 3.0 instead of a 2.2?

the main point is the correct usage of Ant which has (only?) good effects: - no problem anymore with ${} properties that are evaluated too early - far smaller memory consumption

If this release is a 3.0, how do we mark the next important change?

4.0 ;-)

Marc. -- View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/WebTest-next-release%3A-scope-and-time--tf3413136.html#a9588917 Sent from the WebTest mailing list archive at Nabble.com.