14 messages in org.css-discuss.lists.css-d[css-d] font-family font sizes
FromSent OnAttachments
David SharpApr 24, 2007 3:07 am 
Simon WhiteApr 24, 2007 3:30 am 
Philippe WittenberghApr 24, 2007 3:54 am 
David SharpApr 24, 2007 10:50 pm 
Jukka K. KorpelaApr 25, 2007 2:57 pm 
Philippe WittenberghApr 25, 2007 4:53 pm 
Jukka K. KorpelaMay 17, 2007 2:44 pm 
Philippe WittenberghMay 17, 2007 7:03 pm 
Bruno FassinoMay 18, 2007 4:25 am 
Jukka K. KorpelaMay 18, 2007 8:03 am 
Jukka K. KorpelaMay 28, 2007 11:07 am 
Lori LayMay 28, 2007 1:37 pm 
Jukka K. KorpelaMay 28, 2007 1:54 pm 
Philippe WittenberghMay 28, 2007 5:19 pm 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:[css-d] font-family font sizesActions...
From:Simon White (@)
Date:Apr 24, 2007 3:30:40 am
List:org.css-discuss.lists.css-d

Take the site www.syntony.org

I have specified garamond for the titles because it most closely matches the logo I was given, and georgia as a fall-back. However it strikes me that georgia appears quite a bit larger than garamond even at the same specified font size. Although I realise we don't have total control over font sizes (nor should we), however because I use a sans-serif font for the main text, the proportions of the type are affected.

Is there a way to specify different font sizes depending on which font is actually used?

http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/fonts.html#font-size-props

font-size-adjust would appear to help : quoting from the above page

In bicameral scripts, the subjective apparent size and legibility of a font are
less dependent on their 'font-size' value than on the value of their 'x-height',
or, more usefully, on the ratio of these two values, called the aspect value
(font size divided by x-height). The higher the aspect value, the more likely it
is that a font at smaller sizes will be legible. Inversely, faces with a lower
aspect value will become illegible more rapidly below a given threshold size
than faces with a higher aspect value. Straightforward font substitution that
relies on font size alone may lead to illegible characters.

For example, the popular font Verdana has an aspect value of 0.58; when
Verdana's font size 100 units, its x-height is 58 units. For comparison, Times
New Roman has an aspect value of 0.46. Verdana will therefore tend to remain
legible at smaller sizes than Times New Roman. Conversely, Verdana will often
look 'too big' if substituted for Times New Roman at a chosen size.

The problem is whether that's supported by browsers... according to
w3schools.com, it's in the CSS2 spec but currently unsupported
(http://www.w3schools.com/css/css_reference.asp#font)

-Simon