

![]() | Start a set with this search |
![]() | Include this search in one of my sets |
![]() | Exclude this search from one of my sets |
![]() | Permalink to these results Paste this link in email or IM: |
| Atom feed for tracking future search results Paste this URL into your reader: |
14 messages in org.css-discuss.lists.css-d[css-d] font-family font sizes| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| David Sharp | Apr 24, 2007 3:07 am | |
| Simon White | Apr 24, 2007 3:30 am | |
| Philippe Wittenbergh | Apr 24, 2007 3:54 am | |
| David Sharp | Apr 24, 2007 10:50 pm | |
| Jukka K. Korpela | Apr 25, 2007 2:57 pm | |
| Philippe Wittenbergh | Apr 25, 2007 4:53 pm | |
| Jukka K. Korpela | May 17, 2007 2:44 pm | |
| Philippe Wittenbergh | May 17, 2007 7:03 pm | |
| Bruno Fassino | May 18, 2007 4:25 am | |
| Jukka K. Korpela | May 18, 2007 8:03 am | |
| Jukka K. Korpela | May 28, 2007 11:07 am | |
| Lori Lay | May 28, 2007 1:37 pm | |
| Jukka K. Korpela | May 28, 2007 1:54 pm | |
| Philippe Wittenbergh | May 28, 2007 5:19 pm |

![]() | Permalink for this message Paste this link in email or IM: |
![]() | Permalink for this thread Paste this link in email or IM: |
| Atom feed for this thread Paste this URL into your reader: |
| Subject: | [css-d] font-family font sizes | Actions... |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Simon White (...@) | |
| Date: | Apr 24, 2007 3:30:40 am | |
| List: | org.css-discuss.lists.css-d | |
Take the site www.syntony.org
I have specified garamond for the titles because it most closely matches the logo I was given, and georgia as a fall-back. However it strikes me that georgia appears quite a bit larger than garamond even at the same specified font size. Although I realise we don't have total control over font sizes (nor should we), however because I use a sans-serif font for the main text, the proportions of the type are affected.
Is there a way to specify different font sizes depending on which font is actually used?
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/fonts.html#font-size-props
font-size-adjust would appear to help : quoting from the above page
In bicameral scripts, the subjective apparent size and legibility of a font are
less dependent on their 'font-size' value than on the value of their 'x-height',
or, more usefully, on the ratio of these two values, called the aspect value
(font size divided by x-height). The higher the aspect value, the more likely it
is that a font at smaller sizes will be legible. Inversely, faces with a lower
aspect value will become illegible more rapidly below a given threshold size
than faces with a higher aspect value. Straightforward font substitution that
relies on font size alone may lead to illegible characters.
For example, the popular font Verdana has an aspect value of 0.58; when
Verdana's font size 100 units, its x-height is 58 units. For comparison, Times
New Roman has an aspect value of 0.46. Verdana will therefore tend to remain
legible at smaller sizes than Times New Roman. Conversely, Verdana will often
look 'too big' if substituted for Times New Roman at a chosen size.
The problem is whether that's supported by browsers... according to
w3schools.com, it's in the CSS2 spec but currently unsupported
(http://www.w3schools.com/css/css_reference.asp#font)
-Simon







