atom feed6 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-hackersRe: I2O
FromSent OnAttachments
Ron G. MinnichJun 29, 1998 6:32 am 
Jamie BowdenJun 29, 1998 12:17 pm 
Ron G. MinnichJun 29, 1998 12:31 pm 
Jordan K. HubbardJun 29, 1998 3:32 pm 
Jim BryantJun 29, 1998 5:24 pm 
Andrew ReillyJun 29, 1998 8:38 pm 
Subject:Re: I2O
From:Ron G. Minnich (rmin@Sarnoff.COM)
Date:Jun 29, 1998 12:31:36 pm
List:org.freebsd.freebsd-hackers

On Mon, 29 Jun 1998, Jamie Bowden wrote:

Why is offloading IO a bad idea? Offloading video and 3D rendering work well, it's what drives 3dfx and it's competitors. Or am I missing something? My basic understanding of I2O is using a subprocessor to handle all IO, thus freeing up the main processor from doing things like waiting on interrupts and the like.

3dfx is not offloading io. It's offloading computation to a special-purpose processor.

Offloading IO can be a good thing in some circumstances if done properly. I2O was not.

ron

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message