8 messages in com.perforce.perforce-user[p4] Client spec enhancement question...
FromSent OnAttachments
Paul Mitchell04 Mar 2003 11:11 
Jeff A. Bowles04 Mar 2003 12:04 
Rick Cameron04 Mar 2003 13:31 
Oren Shemesh04 Mar 2003 22:24 
Andreas Fischer05 Mar 2003 00:15 
wiv...@us.itmasters.com05 Mar 2003 07:09 
Paul Mitchell07 Mar 2003 10:31 
wiv...@us.itmasters.com07 Mar 2003 11:56 
Subject:[p4] Client spec enhancement question...
From:wiv...@us.itmasters.com (wiv@us.itmasters.com)
Date:03/05/2003 07:09:51 AM
List:com.perforce.perforce-user

Oren Shemesh <orens at p-cube.com>:

The major difference between what you want and the 'client -t' command it that you want changes to the template to affect existing clients, which is a way to get all developers using that template to follow some global change that is

taking place.

If such a template system were set up, what happens if the template changes to exclude files that were formerly within the client view? (Esp. if the files are checked out.) It seems to me either everyone takes the risk of suddenly losing access to files, or the have list functionality would need to grow rather complex to deal with it.

I think I might rather see a voluntary update system in which each user gets a warning that the master template they reference has changed and asks if they want to update their link (along with a list of what bad things might happen if they do). This would require versioning the template, but that's not a bad idea anyway. Maybe a client-side option could make such updates automatic on a client by client basis.-Wm