15 messages in com.xensource.lists.xen-ia64-develRe: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] NEW_TLBF...
FromSent OnAttachments
Kouya SHIMURA26 Jan 2007 03:05.patch
Alex Williamson26 Jan 2007 15:06 
Xu, Anthony28 Jan 2007 22:30 
Isaku Yamahata28 Jan 2007 23:35 
Kouya SHIMURA29 Jan 2007 00:09 
Xu, Anthony29 Jan 2007 00:59 
Isaku Yamahata29 Jan 2007 01:03 
Isaku Yamahata29 Jan 2007 01:20 
Xu, Anthony29 Jan 2007 01:58 
Isaku Yamahata29 Jan 2007 02:28 
Kouya SHIMURA29 Jan 2007 02:30 
Xu, Anthony29 Jan 2007 17:45 
Isaku Yamahata29 Jan 2007 19:35 
Xu, Anthony29 Jan 2007 20:16 
Isaku Yamahata29 Jan 2007 21:16 
Subject:Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] NEW_TLBFLUSH_CLOCK_PERIOD_SOFTIRQ is notregistered.
From:Kouya SHIMURA (kou@jp.fujitsu.com)
Date:01/29/2007 12:09:24 AM
List:com.xensource.lists.xen-ia64-devel

Hi,

Isaku Yamahata writes:

Kouya SHIMURA write on 2007年1月26日 19:06:

Hi

NEW_TLBFLUSH_CLOCK_PERIOD_SOFTIRQ is used but not registered. I've never experienced but system will panic in the very long run. I wonder why Isaku missed it.

Ouch! It doesn't cause panic, but it just becomes slow. So I missed it.

No, it will cause a null-pointer exception at do_softirq() in Xen. (*softirq_handlers[i])();

(XEN) $$$$$ PANIC in domain 0 (k6=0xf000000007c38000): ***
xen_handle_domain_access: exception table lookup failed, iip=0xf000000004043e60,
addr=0x0, spinning... [snip] (XEN) [<f000000004043e60>] do_softirq+0x120/0x1b0 (XEN) sp=f000000007c3fe00 bsp=f000000007c39390

I tried it by means of setting tlbflush_clock to huge value.

Anyway, I think it is not concerned with Anthony's problem.

Thanks, Kouya

_______________________________________________ Xen-ia64-devel mailing list Xen-@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel