7 messages in com.canoo.lists.webtestRe: [Webtest] JWebUnit style plugin| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Ed Smith | 05 Jun 2007 11:50 | |
| Marc Guillemot | 06 Jun 2007 04:19 | |
| Paul King | 06 Jun 2007 04:46 | |
| Ed Smith | 06 Jun 2007 05:31 | |
| Ed Smith | 06 Jun 2007 05:39 | |
| Marc Guillemot | 06 Jun 2007 06:04 | |
| Ed Smith | 06 Jun 2007 07:18 |
| Subject: | Re: [Webtest] JWebUnit style plugin![]() |
|---|---|
| From: | Ed Smith (edsm...@yahoo.com) |
| Date: | 06/06/2007 07:18:30 AM |
| List: | com.canoo.lists.webtest |
Marc,
Thanks for the answer. I was hoping that a factoring out the interface would be
easy enough then I (and others??) could look into writing a Selenium
implementation. Such refactoring could be useful even without plugins. WebTest
has already moved once from HttpUnit to HTMLUnit. Of course, I understand that
it's easy for me to say how easy interface factoring would be for somebody else
to do ;). I'd use Selenium RC for Java.
On the conversion side, I have looked for such a converter without success. If
anybody knows of one, I'm interested. Writing my own is certainly a possibility.
As Paul said, a larger man power would be needed for this purpose. If you're interested, you're welcome (this is serious!).
You shouldn't underestimate the work for that. When you talk from Selenium for instance, you probably mean Selenium IDE or Selenium HTA, otherwise it is too limited. Even with that, many WebTest featureswould be missing, so you would end up implementing something for Firefox and something for IE. If you want to reuse your WebTests in Selenium, what about and XSLT to transform your WebTests to Selenium tests?
Marc.
Ed Smith-3 wrote:
The ability to test both in a simulated client (HTMLUnit) and a variety of "real" clients with a single test. If my application fails with IE, I can complaint all I want about its noncompliance with publish standards, but the majority of my users will still be angry with me. Selenium is great for this kind of testing. Of course, I may want to run continuous testing with HTMLUnit because it doesn't posses a browser.
----- Original Message ---- From: Marc Guillemot <mgui...@yahoo.fr> To: webt...@lists.canoo.com Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2007 6:19:51 AM Subject: Re: [Webtest] JWebUnit style plugin
A stupid question: what would this bring?
Marc.
Ed Smith-3 wrote:
JWebUnit 2.X proposes the interesting idea of plugins. You specify tests in JWebUnit lingo, but how the test is performed depends on the plugin. You can choose from HTMLUnit or Selenium as your "real" tester. Of course, this is all theoretical in JWebUnit as version 2.X isn't even working. Has any consideration been given to taking this approach with WebTest?
____________________________________________________________________________________
Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's updated
for today's economy) at Yahoo! Games.
http://get.games.yahoo.com/proddesc?gamekey=monopolyherenow
_______________________________________________ WebTest mailing list WebT...@lists.canoo.com http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/webtest
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/JWebUnit-style-plugin-tf3873622.html#a10988280
Sent from the WebTest mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________ WebTest mailing list WebT...@lists.canoo.com http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/webtest
____________________________________________________________________________________
Fussy? Opinionated? Impossible to please? Perfect. Join Yahoo!'s user panel and
lay it on us. http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7




