17 messages in org.apache.tomcat.usersRe: mod_webapp (was: Re: TOMCAT-STAND...| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Padhu Vinirs | Oct 10, 2002 8:08 am | |
| Padhu Vinirs | Oct 10, 2002 8:19 am | |
| Chris Wolcott | Oct 10, 2002 8:36 am | |
| Chris Wolcott | Oct 10, 2002 8:50 am | |
| Padhu Vinirs | Oct 10, 2002 8:50 am | |
| Padhu Vinirs | Oct 10, 2002 8:51 am | |
| Turner, John | Oct 10, 2002 8:58 am | |
| Padhu Vinirs | Oct 10, 2002 8:58 am | |
| Padhu Vinirs | Oct 10, 2002 9:24 am | |
| Pooleery, Manoj | Oct 10, 2002 9:44 am | |
| Lindomar | Oct 10, 2002 9:47 am | |
| Sam Seaver | Oct 10, 2002 10:42 am | |
| Sam Seaver | Oct 10, 2002 11:20 am | |
| Mark R. Diggory | Oct 10, 2002 3:12 pm | |
| Craig R. McClanahan | Oct 10, 2002 3:23 pm | |
| Gary Henson | Oct 10, 2002 3:30 pm | |
| Glenn Nielsen | Oct 10, 2002 6:45 pm |
| Subject: | Re: mod_webapp (was: Re: TOMCAT-STANDALONE needed with Apache Server?) | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Craig R. McClanahan (crai...@apache.org) | |
| Date: | Oct 10, 2002 3:23:57 pm | |
| List: | org.apache.tomcat.users | |
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Mark R. Diggory wrote:
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 18:13:17 -0400 From: Mark R. Diggory <mdig...@latte.harvard.edu> Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <tomc...@jakarta.apache.org> To: Tomcat Users List <tomc...@jakarta.apache.org> Subject: mod_webapp (was: Re: TOMCAT-STANDALONE needed with Apache Server?)
Hi all,
This is a little confusing, I notice that in 4.1's server.xml file it still has the WARP connector as the "default" example of connecting up to apache. If what you say is the case, should this be mod_jk instead? i.e. Shouldn't this be a more appropriate connector example that works on both Windows and other platforms, expecially if mod_webapp is dead?
There is also a mod_jk connector in the default configuration (on port 8009). The difference is that jk doesn't require a custom service/engine/context hierarchy -- it uses the standard one.
Cheers, -Mark
Craig