| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Paul Prescod | Jun 12, 2006 2:28 pm | |
| Robert D Anderson | Jun 12, 2006 3:11 pm | |
| Erik Hennum | Jun 12, 2006 4:07 pm | .gif, .gif, .gif, 7 more |
| Paul Prescod | Jun 12, 2006 6:09 pm | |
| Erik Hennum | Jun 13, 2006 8:10 am | |
| Paul Prescod | Jun 14, 2006 12:13 pm | |
| Robert D Anderson | Jun 14, 2006 12:53 pm | |
| Paul Prescod | Jun 14, 2006 1:10 pm | |
| Robert D Anderson | Jun 15, 2006 7:16 am | |
| JoAnn Hackos | Jun 15, 2006 7:34 am | |
| Paul Prescod | Jun 15, 2006 7:48 am | |
| JoAnn Hackos | Jun 15, 2006 7:52 am | |
| Esrig, Bruce (Bruce) | Jun 15, 2006 7:57 am | |
| Robert D Anderson | Jun 15, 2006 9:27 am | |
| Esrig, Bruce (Bruce) | Jun 15, 2006 9:39 am | |
| Robert D Anderson | Jun 15, 2006 9:43 am | |
| JoAnn Hackos | Jun 15, 2006 10:08 am | |
| Paul Prescod | Jun 15, 2006 11:19 am | |
| Paul Prescod | Jun 15, 2006 11:20 am | |
| JoAnn Hackos | Jun 15, 2006 11:22 am | |
| Robert D Anderson | Jun 16, 2006 7:09 am | |
| ma...@mekon.com | Jun 16, 2006 8:28 am | |
| JoAnn Hackos | Jun 16, 2006 10:51 am | |
| Robert D Anderson | Jun 16, 2006 6:13 pm | |
| Paul Prescod | Jun 16, 2006 6:24 pm | |
| Paul Prescod | Jun 19, 2006 9:56 am | |
| Robert D Anderson | Jun 19, 2006 10:12 am | |
| Robert D Anderson | Jun 19, 2006 11:26 am | |
| Esrig, Bruce (Bruce) | Jun 19, 2006 12:11 pm | |
| Robert D Anderson | Jun 19, 2006 12:20 pm | |
| Gershon L Joseph | Jun 26, 2006 7:48 am | |
| Grosso, Paul | Jun 26, 2006 8:51 am | |
| Robert D Anderson | Jun 26, 2006 3:04 pm | |
| Grosso, Paul | Jun 26, 2006 3:20 pm | |
| Paul Prescod | Jun 26, 2006 3:38 pm | |
| Robert D Anderson | Jun 26, 2006 5:03 pm | |
| Paul Prescod | Jun 26, 2006 5:59 pm | |
| Grosso, Paul | Jun 27, 2006 7:06 am |
| Subject: | RE: [dita] Complexity of bookmap content model | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Erik Hennum (ehen...@us.ibm.com) | |
| Date: | Jun 13, 2006 8:10:22 am | |
| List: | org.oasis-open.lists.dita | |
Hi, Paul and Robert:
Point well taken about <appendix> after <part> and now that you mention it, I think I recall some inquiries on the DITA user's group about bookmap from people who were creating parts and had trouble finding <appendix>.
Perhaps the designer of the original bookmap was working either from eccentric models or with insufficient coffee....
Thanks,
Erik Hennum ehen...@us.ibm.com
"Paul Prescod" <paul...@xmetal.com> wrote on 06/12/2006 06:09:28 PM:
From: Erik Hennum [mailto:ehen...@us.ibm.com] Subject: Re: [dita] Complexity of bookmap content model
...
As I recall, the rationale for the chapter / appendix / part aspects of the bookmap model was that:
* An unpartitioned book should be able to have chapters followed by appendices
Sounds good!
* A partitioned book should be able to have chapters prior to the first part (in effect, providing an implicit first part without an explicit container) but must put appendices within a part
I don't understand why appendices should go in a part. That's not how it works in the books on my bookshelf (including my own!).
I also don't remember seeing a book WITH a part that has its own appendix, notices, amendments, etc.






.gif, .gif, .gif, 7 more