atom feed46 messages in net.sourceforge.lists.courier-usersRe: [courier-users] RFC2045_ERR8BITHE...
FromSent OnAttachments
Ken NagorskiJan 16, 2002 2:35 pm 
Mark ConstableJan 16, 2002 6:49 pm 
Juha SaarinenJan 16, 2002 7:05 pm 
Aly S.P DharshiJan 16, 2002 7:12 pm 
Tomas FasthJan 17, 2002 1:19 am 
Odhiambo WashingtonJan 17, 2002 2:34 am 
Mark ConstableJan 17, 2002 3:11 am 
Marcus Felipe PereiraJan 17, 2002 6:22 am 
drea...@dreamwvr.comJan 17, 2002 7:33 am 
drea...@dreamwvr.comJan 17, 2002 7:52 am 
Gordon MessmerJan 17, 2002 8:07 am 
Aly S.P DharshiJan 17, 2002 8:11 am 
Papo NapolitanoJan 17, 2002 9:00 am 
Mark ConstableJan 17, 2002 12:26 pm 
Tomas FasthJan 17, 2002 1:47 pm 
Mark ConstableJan 17, 2002 3:35 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJan 17, 2002 3:53 pm 
Petr BurianJan 17, 2002 4:51 pm 
Marcus Felipe PereiraJan 18, 2002 6:26 am 
Alexei Batyr'Jan 18, 2002 9:01 am 
Roland SchneiderJan 18, 2002 9:24 am 
Bill WilliamsonJan 18, 2002 9:29 am 
Aly S.P DharshiJan 18, 2002 9:37 am 
William HueJan 18, 2002 9:58 am 
William HueJan 18, 2002 12:25 pm 
Petr BurianJan 18, 2002 1:09 pm 
William HueJan 18, 2002 1:42 pm 
YaremaJan 18, 2002 1:44 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJan 18, 2002 6:12 pm 
Mark ConstableJan 18, 2002 7:50 pm 
SysopJan 18, 2002 9:36 pm 
David EhleJan 18, 2002 9:55 pm 
Bill WilliamsonJan 18, 2002 10:01 pm 
Tomas FasthJan 19, 2002 9:41 am 
Tomas FasthJan 19, 2002 10:10 am 
Marcus Felipe PereiraJan 19, 2002 12:38 pm 
Mark ConstableJan 19, 2002 11:12 pm 
John LaurJan 20, 2002 1:21 pm 
Olivier PoitreyJan 21, 2002 2:46 am 
Alexei Batyr'Jan 21, 2002 5:37 am 
Olivier PoitreyJan 21, 2002 6:31 am 
Sam VarshavchikJan 21, 2002 8:14 am 
Stefan KrugerJan 23, 2002 8:21 am 
John KlossJan 23, 2002 8:30 am 
Sam VarshavchikJan 23, 2002 3:11 pm 
Chester WisniewskiJan 23, 2002 3:50 pm 
Subject:Re: [courier-users] RFC2045_ERR8BITHEADER and RFC2045_ERR8BITCONTENT
From:Mark Constable (mar@renta.net)
Date:Jan 17, 2002 3:35:41 pm
List:net.sourceforge.lists.courier-users

On Fri, 18 Jan 2002 07:47, Tomas Fasth wrote:

I think you're right, but your moment of disappointment seem to affect your judgement. It's a couple of patched lines of source code, nothing more.

Multply that by a dozen servers AND every time a new version of courier-mta comes out vs apt-get, no comparison.

It's not like Sam has to allow courier-mta to become defiled by not being the most compliant MTA out there... it's just a "couple of patched lines of source" that could allow many (I guess) courier-mta users to have a run-time choice in the matter. Even attachments from NetworkSolutions don't work.

So what's the issue? Are you unable to compile a patched source tree yourself? Are you forbidden to tamper with open source by your employer? Do you have a policy of only installing binaries as distributed by a official distributor? ...

Yes to the last one. Every time I try to self-maintain various patched versions of any particular package then that need and situation deteriorates into a disaster over time but that's my problem, not courier-mta or this lists.

This is an example of the crap I have to deal with. Maybe I'm the only ISP-tech on this list with even a moderate amount of real-world users trying to justify courier-mta.

----- Original Message ----- From: "Glenys Barns" <glenbar@cooloola.x> To: <Undisclosed-Recipient:> Sent: Thursday, 17 January 2002 10:27 pm Subject: Fw: Outcome Focus Ezine, January 14, 2002

Ian, I don't know if you can make any sense out of all this. I received a message from the Courier Mail Server 0.36.1 on cooloola.x. It stated that a message I had received was a corrupt message I sent it on to the sender and this is what came back. I don't know how to send the message to the Courier Mail Server so I am sending the lot to you. Good luck Glenys

----- Original Message ----- From: Paul Cummings <pa@impressionmanagement.com> To: 'Glenys Barns' <glenbar@cooloola.x> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 7:13 AM Subject: RE: Outcome Focus Ezine, January 14, 2002

Dear Glenys,

Below is the message I received from Sparklist. They suggest that you send the info to your ISP and see what they think the issue might be.

Let me know how it works out,

Paul

Date: 1/15/2002 10:48:20 AM Work Order #: 20602

Resolution:

Paul,

This is an issue the recipient will need to take up with their ISP. It is a setting on their end.

Thank you,

Gary Macklin SparkLIST.com Technical Support SparkLIST.com Corporation . The High-Performance Email List Publishing Experts .

and on and on it goes...