Hahaha : ).
It was generating odd messages here, like [test $-7614554]. But I'm
on an intel mac using Pd-Extended autobuilds, so that's probably
Yes, I think a character escaping mechanism would be a good thing,
though of course escaping is already used in the pd-fileformat so who
knows what madness it would require.
On 2/8/07, Chris McCormick <chr...@mccormick.cx> wrote:
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 12:16:02AM -0700, Luke Iannini (pd) wrote:
Hm... I'm not sure if your patch was supposed to "work" or demonstrate
my issue, Chris... thanks for making it regardless : ).
It was supposed to solve your problem.
Thanks to both of yas! Should probably add this to puredata.org or
something for posterity. Or a bug report since it's obviously a
If you consider it a kludge, then most of Pd is a kludge. ;)
I don't think it's that bad, or at least no worse than any of the other
dynamic patching stuff. Maybe slightly better would be a character
escaping mechanism like [\$0(