23 messages in com.perforce.revml[revml] Re: breaking up long command ...
FromSent OnAttachments
barries02 Jul 2001 08:36 
david d zuhn03 Jul 2001 08:48 
barries03 Jul 2001 09:38 
david d zuhn03 Jul 2001 11:43 
barries03 Jul 2001 13:22 
barries03 Jul 2001 21:56 
david d zuhn05 Jul 2001 09:13 
barries05 Jul 2001 10:58 
david d zuhn05 Jul 2001 11:17 
barries05 Jul 2001 11:25 
david d zuhn05 Jul 2001 11:44 
barries05 Jul 2001 12:20 
barries16 Jul 2001 11:51 
david d zuhn16 Jul 2001 11:51 
david d zuhn18 Jul 2001 12:04 
barries18 Jul 2001 12:40 
david d zuhn18 Jul 2001 12:56 
barries18 Jul 2001 14:09 
ste...@vance.com19 Jul 2001 07:37 
barries19 Jul 2001 07:42 
david d zuhn19 Jul 2001 11:19 
barries19 Jul 2001 11:25 
barries19 Jul 2001 13:54 
Subject:[revml] Re: breaking up long command lines....
From:ste...@vance.com (ste@vance.com)
Date:07/19/2001 07:37:43 AM
List:com.perforce.revml

Well, I'll do something like xargs that allows a bunch of parameters, just not all of them, or use "p4 -x -" syntax and pipe the parms in to it's stdin. The only reason I hesitate to use that syntax is that I don't know how long ago it was introduced and I want to be pretty backwards compatible. It was there in 99.1, at least, so I guess I'll use it and go to an xargs-like invocation loop if somebody reports problems.

The -x flag has been present as long as I've been using Perforce, so at least since 97.3. It also works portably, whereas xargs proper will give you problems off of Unix.

Steve

--------------------------------------------- This message was sent using WebMail by CyberGate. http://www.valueweb.net/webmail