atom feed15 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.docbookRe: [docbook] Re: Followup to Norm's ...
FromSent OnAttachments
Bob StaytonJun 29, 2006 2:39 pm 
Rowland, LarryJul 17, 2006 12:54 pm 
Rowland, LarryJul 17, 2006 1:02 pm 
Jirka KosekJul 19, 2006 2:21 am.bin
Neil RoethJul 19, 2006 4:46 am 
Jirka KosekJul 19, 2006 8:23 am.bin
Steven CogornoJul 19, 2006 9:22 am 
Norman WalshJul 19, 2006 9:51 am.pgp
nicoJul 19, 2006 12:08 pm 
nicoJul 19, 2006 12:54 pm 
Norman WalshJul 19, 2006 1:44 pm.pgp
Jirka KosekJul 19, 2006 1:45 pm.bin
John L. ClarkJul 19, 2006 2:12 pm.pgp
Dave PawsonJul 20, 2006 11:17 am 
nicoJul 20, 2006 12:30 pm 
Subject:Re: [docbook] Re: Followup to Norm's write up on numbering.
From:Dave Pawson (dav@dpawson.co.uk)
Date:Jul 20, 2006 11:17:06 am
List:org.oasis-open.lists.docbook

On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 21:59 +0200, nico wrote:

PIs are good, but specific to a processor. No, specific to an author? IMHO line numbering step is not specific to a processor, and the document should not be aware of all the processors that can be applied on it.

I.e. the xsl processing should not be aware of this level of detail?

I'm with Norm, leave it out. This is user specific processing IMHO?

regards

-- Regards,

Dave Pawson XSLT + Docbook FAQ http://www.dpawson.co.uk