14 messages in com.canoo.lists.webtestRE: [Webtest] Re: Timeout value for i...
FromSent OnAttachments
Denis N. Antonioli25 Jan 2006 09:41 
Marc Guillemot25 Jan 2006 10:53 
Denis N. Antonioli26 Jan 2006 00:48 
Marc Guillemot26 Jan 2006 10:56 
Marc Guillemot27 Jan 2006 02:10 
Dierk Koenig27 Jan 2006 02:25 
Marc Guillemot27 Jan 2006 02:27 
Dierk Koenig27 Jan 2006 02:50 
Paul King27 Jan 2006 03:17 
Marc Guillemot27 Jan 2006 03:57 
Denis N. Antonioli27 Jan 2006 04:39 
Marc Guillemot31 Jan 2006 02:09 
Denis N. Antonioli31 Jan 2006 02:53 
Marc Guillemot04 Feb 2006 09:02 
Subject:RE: [Webtest] Re: Timeout value for invoke & co. ?
From:Dierk Koenig (dier@canoo.com)
Date:01/27/2006 02:50:43 AM
List:com.canoo.lists.webtest

1 <option name="connectionTimeout" value="123"/>

or

2 <option name="httpclient.connectionTimeout" value="123"/>

1 hides an implementation detail, 2 doesn't. Not sure, whether we want to hide it or not. I don't really have a favourite here - maybe a slight preference for 1.

and additionally (if no option is set) we could look at ant (or system) property "webtest.config.connectionTimeout".

Again, both is ok for me. Maybe System property is better aligned with general handling of connection properties in the JDK.

cheers Mittie