12 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-hackersFreeBSD 6.1 Released| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Scott Long | May 9, 2006 3:19 am | |
| Julian Elischer | May 9, 2006 4:49 am | |
| Mike Jakubik | May 9, 2006 11:31 am | |
| Simon L. Nielsen | May 11, 2006 9:38 pm | |
| Simon L. Nielsen | May 12, 2006 1:52 am | |
| Mark Kirkwood | May 12, 2006 2:31 am | |
| Mike Jakubik | May 12, 2006 2:33 am | |
| Jonathan Noack | May 12, 2006 3:48 am | |
| Mike Jakubik | May 12, 2006 3:49 am | |
| Scott Long | May 12, 2006 5:22 am | |
| Avleen Vig | May 12, 2006 6:58 am | |
| J. T. farmer | May 12, 2006 12:45 pm |
| Subject: | FreeBSD 6.1 Released | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Mark Kirkwood (mar...@paradise.net.nz) | |
| Date: | May 12, 2006 2:31:36 am | |
| List: | org.freebsd.freebsd-hackers | |
Mike Jakubik wrote:
Patches? For what? It's too late now, 6.1 has been released. I sent reminders to the RE team and i made it quite clear on the lists that the quota issue should be described in the relnotes/errata before the release. If the RE team chooses to ignore major bugs and pretend all is fine and dandy, then there is not much patches will do. Heck, im still waiting for Scott to personally fix the problems, as he so graciously offered, but couldn't deliver. I offered to work with him and provide help, he never replied to my emails.
I'm almost afraid to enter into this discussion (puts on flame suit), but might it be better to gently encourage the re/development team to make some of these a priority for 6.2? (as that gives everyone more lead time, and in the end what we all want is FreeBSD to steadily improve).
Cheers
Mark