45 messages in org.apache.lucene.solr-devRe: modularization discussion| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Robert Muir | Apr 26, 2011 8:07 pm | |
| Yonik Seeley | Apr 26, 2011 8:34 pm | |
| Grant Ingersoll | Apr 26, 2011 8:41 pm | |
| Chris Male | Apr 26, 2011 9:12 pm | |
| Robert Muir | Apr 26, 2011 9:14 pm | |
| Michael McCandless | Apr 27, 2011 3:27 am | |
| Michael McCandless | Apr 27, 2011 3:36 am | |
| Mark Miller | Apr 27, 2011 5:12 am | |
| Robert Muir | Apr 27, 2011 5:33 am | |
| Steven A Rowe | Apr 27, 2011 6:18 am | |
| Yonik Seeley | Apr 27, 2011 6:24 am | |
| Steven A Rowe | Apr 27, 2011 6:48 am | |
| Michael McCandless | Apr 27, 2011 8:49 am | |
| Grant Ingersoll | Apr 27, 2011 5:50 pm | |
| Yonik Seeley | Apr 27, 2011 6:23 pm | |
| Greg Stein | Apr 27, 2011 8:44 pm | |
| Grant Ingersoll | May 2, 2011 3:11 pm | |
| Ryan McKinley | May 2, 2011 4:31 pm | |
| Mark Miller | May 2, 2011 7:27 pm | |
| Michael McCandless | May 3, 2011 9:49 am | |
| Michael McCandless | May 3, 2011 9:55 am | |
| Mark Miller | May 3, 2011 10:11 am | |
| Shai Erera | May 3, 2011 10:29 am | |
| Ryan McKinley | May 3, 2011 10:31 am | |
| Mark Miller | May 3, 2011 10:46 am | |
| Michael McCandless | May 4, 2011 5:25 am | |
| Mark Miller | May 4, 2011 6:10 am | |
| Robert Muir | May 4, 2011 6:29 am | |
| Uwe Schindler | May 4, 2011 6:41 am | |
| Mark Miller | May 4, 2011 6:49 am | |
| Simon Willnauer | May 4, 2011 7:01 am | |
| Simon Willnauer | May 5, 2011 1:15 am | |
| Grant Ingersoll | May 5, 2011 7:25 am | |
| Mark Miller | May 5, 2011 7:40 am | |
| Simon Willnauer | May 5, 2011 8:03 am | |
| Grant Ingersoll | May 5, 2011 8:34 am | |
| Jason Rutherglen | May 5, 2011 9:58 am | |
| Chris Hostetter | May 6, 2011 1:35 pm | |
| Mark Miller | May 6, 2011 1:44 pm | |
| Michael McCandless | May 7, 2011 3:30 am | |
| Simon Willnauer | May 7, 2011 3:34 am | |
| Michael McCandless | May 7, 2011 3:45 am | |
| Michael McCandless | May 7, 2011 4:01 am | |
| Simon Willnauer | May 7, 2011 4:10 am | |
| Grant Ingersoll | May 7, 2011 5:20 am |
| Subject: | Re: modularization discussion | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Yonik Seeley (yon...@lucidimagination.com) | |
| Date: | Apr 27, 2011 6:24:51 am | |
| List: | org.apache.lucene.solr-dev | |
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 6:28 AM, Michael McCandless <luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
Why impose namespace restrictions based on where code was originally committed? I think the namespace of refactored code should reflect the nature of the code, not its original origins?
And if it's a very core part of solr that we've tended to hang a lot of new features on, etc, then the nature of that code should still hopefully be "solrish".
For example, when I refactored UnInvertedField, it split nicely into a Solr piece and a core Lucene piece, and so I gave the core Lucene piece then org.apache.lucene.index namespace.
That's because it was factored directly into Lucene-core, not into a module.
I think leaving refactored code in the solr namespace sends the wrong message (ie, that this module "depends" on Solr somehow). The lucene namespace makes it clear that it only depends on Lucene.
But that won't be true... it's likely that many modules will depend on other modules.
But as I said... it seems only fair to meet half way and use the solr namespace for some modules and the lucene namespace for others.
-Yonik