atom feed10 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.officeRE: [office] Groups - OpenDocument-v1...
FromSent OnAttachments
patr...@durusau.netFeb 17, 2009 7:04 am 
Dennis E. HamiltonFeb 22, 2009 6:42 pm 
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - HamburgFeb 23, 2009 12:20 am 
Dennis E. HamiltonFeb 23, 2009 9:48 am 
Mary McRaeFeb 23, 2009 10:10 am 
Doug MahughFeb 25, 2009 12:51 pm 
Mary McRaeFeb 25, 2009 1:23 pm 
robe...@us.ibm.comFeb 25, 2009 1:41 pm 
Doug MahughMar 15, 2009 5:06 pm 
robe...@us.ibm.comMar 15, 2009 7:50 pm 
Subject:RE: [office] Groups - OpenDocument-v1.2-committeeDraft-01 -- Schemas?
From:Doug Mahugh (Doug@microsoft.com)
Date:Feb 25, 2009 12:51:54 pm
List:org.oasis-open.lists.office

Hi Mary,

I'm confused about the status of the document that was voted on last week. In
2.18 Specification Quality
(http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/process.php#specQuality), there is this
sentence:

"All TC-approved versions of documents (i.e. Committee Drafts, Public Review
Drafts, and Committee Specifications) must be delivered to the TC’s document
repository in the (1) editable source, (2) HTML or XHTML, and (3) PDF formats;
and the TC must explicitly designate one of those delivered formats as the
authoritative document."

The minutes of the 2/16 meeting state that there was "Approval of OpenDocument
v1.2 draft 9 as Committee Draft," so it sounds to me like we need to publish in
the three formats listed above, which are required for Committee Drafts (as well
as Public Review Drafts). Is there a reason that sentence doesn't apply? I
mention this because we're proactively asking for public feedback on ODF v-next,
and I assume we'd want to assure the broadest possible readership for the
Committee Draft so that people can understand what's in it when they make their
suggestions.

Thanks, Doug

-----Original Message----- From: Mary McRae [mailto:mary@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Mary McRae Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 10:11 AM To: denn@acm.org; Mich@Sun.COM Cc: patr@durusau.net; off@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: RE: [office] Groups - OpenDocument-v1.2-committeeDraft-01 -- Schemas?

Just as an FYI, no official public review has been requested as of yet. I
believe Patrick is still editing the specification. When the spec is ready, the
TC will first approve it as a new committee draft and then approve submitting it
for 60-day public review. The TC will need to provide me with the editable
source, HTML, and PDF editions of the specification as well as all related
files. Schemas/DTDs/etc must be in separate plain text files and verified by the
TC to be valid/well-formed. The specification must meet the requirements set
forth in the OASSI TC Process and conform to the OASIS templates and naming
guidelines. Once approved, I then send out the notice and the official public
review comment period begins.

Regards,

-----Original Message----- From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:denn@acm.org] Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 12:49 PM To: Mich@Sun.COM Cc: patr@durusau.net; off@lists.oasis-open.org; 'Mary McRae' Subject: RE: [office] Groups - OpenDocument-v1.2-committeeDraft-01 -- Schemas?

My concern was the absence of anything in cd01 that identified the schema that applies to it and that anyone treating cd01 as a "preview" could use to know how to find the schema that goes with it.

I hope that was cleared up on the call. Of course I know where the schema is. I wasn't sure any onlookers would know where to look. Also, any announcement Mary makes about there being a cd01, if that is what she intends, should specify where the schema can be found.

Does that clarify my concern?

- Dennis

-----Original Message----- From: Mich@Sun.COM [mailto:Mich@Sun.COM] Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 00:21 To: denn@acm.org Cc: patr@durusau.net; off@lists.oasis-open.org; Mary McRae Subject: Re: [office] Groups - OpenDocument-v1.2-committeeDraft-01 -- Schemas?

Dennis,

I think you have found the schemas yourself already, as you copied from them a few minutes ago.

That the schemas are not mentioned in Patrick's mails has the simple reason that Patrick has uploaded the draft, while I have uploaded the schema. See

http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200902/msg00151.html

I hope this helps.

Michael

On 02/23/09 03:43, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:

Um, what about the schemas. There are no schemas in the document any

more, are we going to provide a copy of the schemas as of the version of this draft?

- Dennis

-----Original Message----- From: patr@durusau.net [mailto:patr@durusau.net] Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 07:05 To: off@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [office] Groups - OpenDocument-v1.2-committeeDraft-01 (OpenDocument-v1.2-committeeDraft-01.odt) uploaded

Greetings!

The first committee draft of ODF 1.2!

Do note that this means we all need to re-double our efforts to proof and resolve any issues (remaining or otherwise) that we see with the text.

Hope everyone is having a great week!

Patrick

-- Patrick Durusau*

The document named OpenDocument-v1.2-committeeDraft-01 (OpenDocument-v1.2-committeeDraft-01.odt) has been submitted by Patrick Durusau* to the OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC document repository.

Document Description: The first committee draft of ODF 1.2.

View Document Details: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=31264

Download Document: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/31264/OpenDocument- v1.2-committeeDraft-01.odt

PLEASE NOTE: If the above links do not work for you, your email application may be breaking the link into two pieces. You may be able to copy and paste the entire link address into the address field of your web browser.

-OASIS Open Administration

Sitz der Gesellschaft: Sun Microsystems GmbH, Sonnenallee 1, D-85551 Kirchheim-Heimstetten Amtsgericht Muenchen: HRB 161028 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Thomas Schroeder, Wolfgang Engels, Dr. Roland Boemer Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates: Martin Haering