18 messages in net.sourceforge.lists.courier-maildropRe: [maildropl] Re: replacing procmai...
FromSent OnAttachments
David RelsonJun 21, 2004 5:56 pm 
PollywogJun 21, 2004 6:20 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJun 21, 2004 7:01 pm 
PollywogJun 21, 2004 7:31 pm 
David RelsonJun 21, 2004 8:18 pm 
Robin Lynn FrankJun 21, 2004 9:05 pm 
Ron JohnsonJun 22, 2004 1:33 am 
Matthias AndreeJun 22, 2004 3:26 am 
David RelsonJun 22, 2004 5:04 am 
Tony EarnshawJun 22, 2004 5:08 am 
David RelsonJun 22, 2004 5:19 am 
Devin RubiaJun 22, 2004 7:34 am 
Ron JohnsonJun 22, 2004 8:15 am 
Robin Lynn FrankJun 22, 2004 8:25 am 
Matthias AndreeJun 22, 2004 8:29 am 
Nick SimicichJun 22, 2004 11:32 am 
David RelsonJun 22, 2004 2:27 pm 
Robin Lynn FrankJun 22, 2004 4:07 pm 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:Re: [maildropl] Re: replacing procmail with maildropActions...
From:Tony Earnshaw (ton@billy.demon.nl)
Date:Jun 22, 2004 5:08:42 am
List:net.sourceforge.lists.courier-maildrop

tir, 22.06.2004 kl. 10.33 skrev Ron Johnson:

If maildrop's processes are owned by the user being delivered to, then it stands to reason that the only way you are going to be able to open a cntral og file is if it is world-writeable and that is not an option I'd care to use.

I'll settle for putting individual logs in each user's home directory.

What about a world-writable directory like, say, /usr/local/data ?

Flies in the face of all that's sensible. Flies in the face of the whole concept of security. Why should it be necessary? Redesign maildrop's logging.

--Tonni

--

We make out of the quarrel with others rhetoric but out of the quarrel with ourselves, poetry.

mail: ton@billy.demon.nl http://www.billy.demon.nl