atom feed51 messages in at.iem.pd-devRe: Fwd: Re: [PD-dev] Yves Degoyon
FromSent OnAttachments
Mathieu BouchardDec 29, 2005 12:14 pm 
Tim BlechmannDec 29, 2005 1:48 pm 
Mathieu BouchardDec 29, 2005 2:15 pm 
Mathieu BouchardDec 29, 2005 2:32 pm 
Mathieu BouchardDec 29, 2005 2:47 pm 
Tim BlechmannDec 29, 2005 3:31 pm 
ydeg...@free.frDec 29, 2005 5:46 pm 
cDec 29, 2005 6:42 pm 
Mathieu BouchardDec 29, 2005 6:55 pm 
Marc LavalléeDec 29, 2005 8:48 pm 
Hans-Christoph SteinerDec 29, 2005 10:42 pm 
Mathieu BouchardDec 30, 2005 6:39 am 
Marc LavalléeDec 30, 2005 9:49 am 
Yves DegoyonDec 30, 2005 12:45 pm 
Yves DegoyonDec 30, 2005 12:48 pm 
Hans-Christoph SteinerDec 30, 2005 2:12 pm 
Yves DegoyonDec 30, 2005 2:18 pm 
Mathieu BouchardDec 30, 2005 3:20 pm 
Christian KlippelDec 30, 2005 4:28 pm 
Mathieu BouchardDec 30, 2005 7:26 pm 
Kyle KlipowiczDec 30, 2005 7:36 pm 
David Plans CasalDec 31, 2005 4:08 am 
ydeg...@free.frJan 1, 2006 9:48 am 
ydeg...@free.frJan 1, 2006 9:52 am 
ydeg...@free.frJan 1, 2006 10:46 am 
Christian KlippelJan 1, 2006 10:57 am 
ydeg...@free.frJan 1, 2006 11:09 am 
Christian KlippelJan 1, 2006 11:41 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerJan 1, 2006 12:22 pm 
Tim BlechmannJan 1, 2006 12:32 pm 
ydeg...@free.frJan 1, 2006 1:34 pm 
ydeg...@free.frJan 1, 2006 1:42 pm 
Christian KlippelJan 1, 2006 1:50 pm 
David Plans CasalJan 2, 2006 3:50 am 
ydeg...@free.frJan 2, 2006 1:07 pm 
Mathieu BouchardJan 2, 2006 2:30 pm 
Marc LavalléeJan 2, 2006 5:32 pm 
Hans-Christoph SteinerJan 2, 2006 11:52 pm 
Hans-Christoph SteinerJan 3, 2006 12:13 am 
Mathieu BouchardJan 3, 2006 7:44 am 
cJan 3, 2006 9:07 am 
Marc LavalléeJan 3, 2006 9:41 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerJan 3, 2006 5:35 pm 
Marc LavalléeJan 4, 2006 7:10 am 
B. BogartJan 4, 2006 9:18 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerJan 4, 2006 9:24 am 
Marc LavalléeJan 4, 2006 11:00 am 
Chris McCormickJan 5, 2006 3:26 pm 
Hans-Christoph SteinerJan 5, 2006 7:29 pm 
Hans-Christoph SteinerJan 5, 2006 7:35 pm 
Marc LavalléeJan 6, 2006 6:35 am 
Subject:Re: Fwd: Re: [PD-dev] Yves Degoyon
From:Christian Klippel (ck@mamalala.de)
Date:Jan 1, 2006 1:50:08 pm
List:at.iem.pd-dev

Am Sonntag 01 Januar 2006 22:35 schrieb ydeg@free.fr:

ola,

so, what do you mean exactly?

that doing an object called "osc" ( and also *~, and also many more ) in a patcher like pd, has _nothing to do with pd, _klaro_

who are you trying to fool around? this won't help people to think you're a copycat, man ...

and without conciousness .... that's the problem ...

i feel very clean, sane and happy, if you'd like to know.

saludos, desde el mundo moviendose, para lo mejor..

sevy ----- End forwarded message -----

actually, you are fooling yourself enough.

again, get the facts straight before you suppose anything about anyone/anything :

the graphical representation of the ~ is used for centuries now to show that either a (signal) generator is meant and since decades it also means any form of alternating signal. now a question do you: what do you think is the reason that the ~ symbol is used in (not only) pd to show that it has to do with a signal?

also, im sorry that * is used as symbol for multiplication in pd, but you might be surprised to know that this is the case for decades in the computer world, even before pd was born.

should i also add that im sorry that mathematical names like sin, cos, abs, etc. are used in karma as well? if so, miller should be sorry for using these terms because that is what they are called in c as well. and probably kerningham and richie are not even allowed to use these terms, since some mathematicians even have used that before. well, at least according to your funky understanding.

btw, if you really complain that someone uses someone elses ideas in his own stuff, you might be surprised to know that exactly that is one of the reasons that open source exist.

haha, really, the more you say, the more you contradict yourself. why cant you just admit and say "damn, i made a mistake by assuming this or that, im sorry for that"?

youre really funny, boy.....

chris