Hey DK --
I thought about this for awhile, and GWT should already be doing browser
cacheing of resources on its own. As far as which is faster, browser cache
or Gears cache, I'm not sure. There's a lot to think about with this
question because GWT generates it's own filenames, and it might get messy
trying to keep up with it's auto-generated files each time you iterate your
code. However, I haven't tried any of this myself so I don't know that I
can give you the best advice.
Maybe a good idea would be to go to the GWT group, and ask if anyone has
done this. Also, the GWT team might be able to chime in and tell what the
best approach is, and whether it would be faster than their own cacheing.
-Ben
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 7:20 PM, dk <deni...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
I've got a gwt application, and I'm wondering if it'll be snappier if
I store the generated artifacts in gears? or is it really the same as
the browser cache?
3 messages in com.googlegroups.google-gears[google-gears] Re: performance of you...