On 5/12/08, Jan Kriesten <jan....@renitence.de> wrote:
The 'We wont support this' dogma isn't really proper argumentation.
Are you providing the 24x7 free support then?
that's actually not the point, is it? i'm trying to help out on the irc
channel as well as good as i can. so you can't claim that all yourself.
I don't do that. I pose that it is very easy to say that feature X
must be implemented when you don't have to do anything yourself in
supporting feature X.
just get back to serious discussion and don't hide behind this statement
you're repeating over and over.
It is a matter of fact: should we support this or not. Support takes
time and effort. Failing to acknowledge that and telling us that
valuing our own time and effort is not an argument is a serious
as i stated, i really appreciate your work - but that doesn't mean one
isn't allowed to formulate (light) criticism.
Criticism is fine, but disregarding a valid argument because you don't
have to maintain it yourself is not.