atom feed18 messages in at.iem.pd-listRe: [PD] Jmax VS PD
FromSent OnAttachments
Guilherme CarvalhoJul 31, 2002 1:27 pm 
nullpointerJul 31, 2002 3:34 pm 
marius schebellaJul 31, 2002 4:03 pm 
Frank BarknechtJul 31, 2002 11:27 pm 
Olaf MatthesAug 1, 2002 12:35 am 
marius schebellaAug 1, 2002 12:51 am 
Frank BarknechtAug 1, 2002 1:15 am 
Lee WilsonAug 1, 2002 6:17 am 
Miller PucketteAug 1, 2002 1:58 pm 
markAug 1, 2002 3:05 pm 
Mathieu BouchardAug 1, 2002 3:11 pm 
J. Scott HildebrandAug 1, 2002 3:30 pm 
Andre SchmidtAug 1, 2002 3:31 pm 
Yves DegoyonAug 1, 2002 3:38 pm 
Bryan JurishAug 1, 2002 4:35 pm 
Miller PucketteAug 1, 2002 7:46 pm 
Guilherme CarvalhoAug 2, 2002 2:02 am 
Guilherme CarvalhoAug 2, 2002 1:30 pm 
Subject:Re: [PD] Jmax VS PD
From:Bryan Jurish (moo@ling.uni-potsdam.de)
Date:Aug 1, 2002 4:35:02 pm
List:at.iem.pd-list

On 2 August 2002 at 00:38:28, Yves Degoyon wrote:

more seriously, some not-too-partial elements of choice can be found in the mailing-list archive :

http://iem.kug.ac.at/mailinglists/pd-list/

just, search "jmax".

we're not gonna get through all of this again. nothing has changed much.

not having committed my mustard in the past, i'd just like to comment that i also have tried out both jmax and pd, concentrating on jmax (2.4.x, 2.5.x under linux) for a goodly while until i realized that pd's resident memory signature is oodles smaller than jmax's (all that java) and that when it comes down to it, they both offer pretty much the same kind of processing possibilities... these days, i prefer pd.

marmosets, Bryan