Messages per Month
| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Guilherme Carvalho | Jul 31, 2002 1:27 pm | |
| nullpointer | Jul 31, 2002 3:34 pm | |
| marius schebella | Jul 31, 2002 4:03 pm | |
| Frank Barknecht | Jul 31, 2002 11:27 pm | |
| Olaf Matthes | Aug 1, 2002 12:35 am | |
| marius schebella | Aug 1, 2002 12:51 am | |
| Frank Barknecht | Aug 1, 2002 1:15 am | |
| Lee Wilson | Aug 1, 2002 6:17 am | |
| Miller Puckette | Aug 1, 2002 1:58 pm | |
| mark | Aug 1, 2002 3:05 pm | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | Aug 1, 2002 3:11 pm | |
| J. Scott Hildebrand | Aug 1, 2002 3:30 pm | |
| Andre Schmidt | Aug 1, 2002 3:31 pm | |
| Yves Degoyon | Aug 1, 2002 3:38 pm | |
| Bryan Jurish | Aug 1, 2002 4:35 pm | |
| Miller Puckette | Aug 1, 2002 7:46 pm | |
| Guilherme Carvalho | Aug 2, 2002 2:02 am | |
| Guilherme Carvalho | Aug 2, 2002 1:30 pm |
| Subject: | Re: [PD] Jmax VS PD | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Bryan Jurish (moo...@ling.uni-potsdam.de) | |
| Date: | Aug 1, 2002 4:35:02 pm | |
| List: | at.iem.pd-list | |
On 2 August 2002 at 00:38:28, Yves Degoyon wrote:
more seriously, some not-too-partial elements of choice can be found in the mailing-list archive :
http://iem.kug.ac.at/mailinglists/pd-list/
just, search "jmax".
we're not gonna get through all of this again. nothing has changed much.
not having committed my mustard in the past, i'd just like to comment that i also have tried out both jmax and pd, concentrating on jmax (2.4.x, 2.5.x under linux) for a goodly while until i realized that pd's resident memory signature is oodles smaller than jmax's (all that java) and that when it comes down to it, they both offer pretty much the same kind of processing possibilities... these days, i prefer pd.
marmosets, Bryan





