atom feed55 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-currentRe: propose: all arch move into a sep...
FromSent OnAttachments
paradoxMar 4, 2010 5:50 am 
Dimitry AndricMar 4, 2010 6:47 am 
Kevin ObermanMar 4, 2010 8:26 am 
M. Warner LoshMar 4, 2010 9:19 am 
Xin LIMar 4, 2010 10:35 am 
Mark LinimonMar 4, 2010 11:12 am 
paradoxMar 4, 2010 11:32 am 
Ed SchoutenMar 4, 2010 12:05 pm 
paradoxMar 4, 2010 12:23 pm 
Robert WatsonMar 5, 2010 1:11 am 
Robert WatsonMar 5, 2010 1:16 am 
Poul-Henning KampMar 5, 2010 1:22 am 
Alex KedaMar 5, 2010 1:30 am 
Robert WatsonMar 5, 2010 1:41 am 
Poul-Henning KampMar 5, 2010 1:43 am 
Doug RabsonMar 5, 2010 1:44 am 
Poul-Henning KampMar 5, 2010 1:52 am 
Alex KedaMar 5, 2010 1:56 am 
Doug RabsonMar 5, 2010 1:59 am 
Mark LinimonMar 5, 2010 2:19 am 
Alex KedaMar 5, 2010 2:47 am 
Poul-Henning KampMar 5, 2010 2:59 am 
Svein Skogen (Listmail Account)Mar 5, 2010 3:01 am 
Doug RabsonMar 5, 2010 3:03 am 
Alex KedaMar 5, 2010 3:10 am 
Doug RabsonMar 5, 2010 3:16 am 
Alex KedaMar 5, 2010 3:26 am 
Poul-Henning KampMar 5, 2010 3:28 am 
Doug RabsonMar 5, 2010 3:31 am 
Alex KedaMar 5, 2010 3:35 am 
Dag-Erling SmørgravMar 5, 2010 4:06 am 
Dag-Erling SmørgravMar 5, 2010 4:08 am 
Alexander LeidingerMar 5, 2010 4:20 am 
Bernd WalterMar 5, 2010 4:51 am 
Robert WatsonMar 5, 2010 5:19 am 
Robert WatsonMar 5, 2010 5:21 am 
Robert WatsonMar 5, 2010 5:23 am 
Bruce SimpsonMar 5, 2010 8:31 am 
Julian ElischerMar 5, 2010 10:09 am 
Garrett CooperMar 6, 2010 1:21 am 
Garrett CooperMar 6, 2010 1:28 am 
Robert HuffMar 6, 2010 6:26 am 
David O'BrienMar 6, 2010 9:26 pm 
David O'BrienMar 6, 2010 9:29 pm 
David O'BrienMar 6, 2010 9:37 pm 
David O'BrienMar 6, 2010 9:43 pm 
Robert WatsonMar 7, 2010 12:50 pm 
M. Warner LoshMar 7, 2010 1:47 pm 
M. Warner LoshMar 7, 2010 1:48 pm 
David O'BrienMar 7, 2010 4:01 pm 
David O'BrienMar 7, 2010 4:16 pm 
M. Warner LoshMar 7, 2010 4:48 pm 
Garrett WollmanMar 7, 2010 7:29 pm 
Garrett CooperMar 7, 2010 10:15 pm 
Poul-Henning KampMar 8, 2010 4:16 am 
Subject:Re: propose: all arch move into a separate dir
From:Doug Rabson (df@rabson.org)
Date:Mar 5, 2010 3:03:24 am
List:org.freebsd.freebsd-current

On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 13:48:17 +0300, Alex Keda <adm@lissyara.su> wrote:

On 05.03.2010 12:59, Doug Rabson wrote:

On 5 Mar 2010, at 09:56, Alex Keda wrote:

On 05.03.2010 12:45, Doug Rabson wrote:

On 5 Mar 2010, at 09:30, Alex Keda wrote:

On 05.03.2010 12:17, Robert Watson wrote:

consumers like Isilon, NetApp, Juniper, and many others

thus, it is not 'Free', this managed by 'consumers like Isilon, NetApp, Juniper, and many others'?

It might be helpful to think of them as 'customers' who are using our 'product' and paying for it by feeding back patches and employing FreeBSD developers. Normal business practice doesn't include intentionally making your customers' lives difficult - if you make a habit of it they tend to go elsewhere.

It seems to me, business and freedom - are mutually exclusive things. or you can choose the path of development, or who pays - giver commands to community. no freedom there.

Someone always pays. If this project didn't have sponsors like Isilon, NetApp, Juniper, Yahoo, and many others it simply would not exist.

then can a more correct name of the project or ClosedBSD or ManagedBSD? =) or something abstract?

No.