8 messages in com.mysql.lists.clusterRe: Recommendations for upscaling
FromSent OnAttachments
subl...@gmail.com18 May 2008 15:55 
Saravanan18 May 2008 16:03 
Jimmy Guerrero18 May 2008 20:07 
Jeff Sturm18 May 2008 22:07 
Andrew Martin19 May 2008 10:32 
ewen fortune19 May 2008 10:59 
Rick James19 May 2008 15:31 
Richard McLean27 May 2008 19:02 
Subject:Re: Recommendations for upscaling
From:Saravanan (suzu@yahoo.com)
Date:05/18/2008 04:03:58 PM
List:com.mysql.lists.cluster

Hi Andrew,

Replication can be done with any different hardware architecture. But they are
asynchronous. Replication are not guranteed at the same time as it updates in
the master.

In cluster you should use same architecture. They are synchronous.

Thanks, Saravanan

--- On Mon, 5/19/08, subl@gmail.com <subl@gmail.com> wrote:

From: subl@gmail.com <subl@gmail.com> Subject: Recommendations for upscaling To: clus@lists.mysql.com, repl@lists.mysql.com Date: Monday, May 19, 2008, 5:25 AM Hello,

I work for a small business running accounting and business management software (SaaS) on a single busy server, and we are planning to upscale to multiple servers. Having synchronous data is vital. In light of this:

Is it possible for a replicated server to be synchronous? Are slaves run on hardware that is identical to the master? Can anybody recommend Continuent's middleware?

Apologies for cross posting to the replication and cluster lists.

Many thanks,

Andrew Martin

-- MySQL Cluster Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/cluster To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/cluster?unsub=suzu@yahoo.com