4 messages in com.canoo.lists.webtestRE: [Webtest] Webtest and Domino| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Simon Brown | 14 Jan 2003 06:47 | |
| Dierk Koenig | 14 Jan 2003 10:24 | |
| Simon Brown | 15 Jan 2003 01:07 | |
| Dierk Koenig | 15 Jan 2003 01:44 |
| Subject: | RE: [Webtest] Webtest and Domino![]() |
|---|---|
| From: | Dierk Koenig (dier...@canoo.com) |
| Date: | 01/15/2003 01:44:13 AM |
| List: | com.canoo.lists.webtest |
ok, seems you'll need to dive into the httpunit details then...
cheers Mittie
-----Original Message----- From: webt...@lists.canoo.com [mailto:webt...@lists.canoo.com]On Behalf Of Simon Brown Sent: Mittwoch, 15. Januar 2003 10:08 To: webt...@gate.canoo.com Subject: RE: [Webtest] Webtest and Domino
At 19:25 14/01/2003 +0100, you wrote:
Hi Simon,
you can nest arbitrary http headers in the config, see http://webtest.canoo.com/webtest/manual/syntax.html#2. Try requesting http version 1.0.
Please report your findings.
I have looked at this, but the only place in an HTTP request where the protocol version is specified is in the initial GET/PUT/POST line - the specifiable request headers don't include the HTTP version. The RFC is not too clear on this point, but that's how it seems to work.
I did try specifying an "HTTP-Version" header, but it didn't seem to have any effect.
Cheers,
Simes.
-- Simon Brown <sim...@simes.org>
"He's saying it's just a cake, sir." "We can't take that chance. Order full orbital response."
_______________________________________________ WebTest mailing list WebT...@lists.canoo.com http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/webtest




