| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Murray Stokely | Oct 8, 2003 2:48 am | |
| Oliver Fromme | Oct 8, 2003 3:43 am | |
| João Carlos Mendes Luís | Oct 8, 2003 5:24 am | |
| João Carlos Mendes Luís | Oct 8, 2003 5:39 am | |
| Murray Stokely | Oct 8, 2003 8:19 am | |
| Murray Stokely | Oct 8, 2003 8:24 am | |
| Oliver Fromme | Oct 8, 2003 8:54 am | |
| Daniel C. Sobral | Oct 8, 2003 10:23 am | |
| Ken Smith | Oct 8, 2003 12:42 pm | |
| Murray Stokely | Oct 8, 2003 8:39 pm | |
| Murray Stokely | Oct 8, 2003 8:43 pm | |
| Murray Stokely | Oct 8, 2003 8:54 pm | |
| Daniel C. Sobral | Oct 9, 2003 5:13 am | |
| João Carlos Mendes Luís | Oct 9, 2003 9:04 am |
| Subject: | 4.9-RC2 is on ftp-master.. | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Murray Stokely (mur...@freebsdmall.com) | |
| Date: | Oct 8, 2003 8:24:14 am | |
| List: | org.freebsd.freebsd-hubs | |
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 12:41:04PM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote:
Just a small question: Wouldn't it be a good idea to put each RC under its own subdirectory in ISO-IMAGES, too?
I don't think so, but it has been brought up before..
I don't want people to glance at a '4.9' directory along with 4.8, 4.7, etc.. until we actually have something called 4.9 release. Relying on users to actually look inside the directory and see that we only have RCs and not the final release is I think asking too much.
Plus, the whole reason for having the subdirectories (because we have a collection of ISO images that we need to keep together), doesn't really hold during the RC phase when we have at most 2 ISOs.
I don't think you need a new directory for 2 files. It just gets in the way. We already have a pretty deep directory structure for a user logging into the ftp site and just looking to download an ISO.
- Murray





