20 messages in org.apache.james.generalRe: MarkMail: Powered by Apache James
FromSent OnAttachments
Jason HunterNov 7, 2007 6:36 pm 
Stefano BagnaraNov 8, 2007 1:02 am 
Danny AngusNov 8, 2007 1:36 am 
Noel J. BergmanNov 8, 2007 8:30 am 
Noel J. BergmanNov 8, 2007 8:34 am 
Danny AngusNov 8, 2007 8:39 am 
Noel J. BergmanNov 8, 2007 9:32 am 
Jason HunterNov 8, 2007 10:46 am 
Jason HunterNov 8, 2007 10:55 am 
Danny AngusNov 8, 2007 11:12 am 
Norman MaurerNov 8, 2007 12:16 pm 
Norman MaurerNov 8, 2007 12:17 pm 
Norman MaurerNov 8, 2007 12:18 pm 
Jason HunterNov 8, 2007 12:35 pm 
Danny AngusNov 9, 2007 12:15 am 
Robert Burrell DonkinNov 9, 2007 2:51 am 
Danny AngusNov 9, 2007 3:06 am 
Jason HunterNov 9, 2007 3:10 am 
Noel J. BergmanNov 9, 2007 9:52 am 
Robert Burrell DonkinNov 14, 2007 1:38 pm 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:Re: MarkMail: Powered by Apache JamesActions...
From:Danny Angus (dan@apache.org)
Date:Nov 8, 2007 1:36:10 am
List:org.apache.james.general

Jason,

Great stuff! I love it when people use James :-) Most people seem to quietly get on with it, thanks for sharing with us. I already loved MarkMail, this makes me love it even more!

Unfortunately I won't be at ACUS, and I've had to pull my James talk :-(

As for complex conditions you might try JSeive, or alternatively write a rules based matcher yourself.

We did, at one time, have *some* ideas for constructing nesting and conditionality in matcher configs, but it hasn't got off the ground. @Work we recently developed an xml schema for constructing complex conditions, perhaps I should resurrect the idea.

d.