16 messages in net.sourceforge.lists.courier-users[courier-users] Re: Courier-IMAP 2.1....
FromSent OnAttachments
Jeff TuckerOct 2, 2003 1:26 pm 
Sam VarshavchikOct 2, 2003 3:28 pm 
Jeff TuckerOct 2, 2003 8:29 pm 
Sam VarshavchikOct 2, 2003 8:54 pm 
Eduardo RoldanOct 2, 2003 9:51 pm 
Stefan HornburgOct 3, 2003 5:15 am 
Sam VarshavchikOct 3, 2003 2:34 pm 
Jeff TuckerOct 4, 2003 4:37 pm 
Sam VarshavchikOct 4, 2003 6:26 pm 
Jeff TuckerOct 5, 2003 5:21 pm 
Sam VarshavchikOct 5, 2003 6:12 pm 
Jeff TuckerOct 6, 2003 10:26 pm 
Sam VarshavchikOct 7, 2003 5:37 am.txt
Jeff TuckerOct 8, 2003 6:25 pm 
Sam VarshavchikOct 8, 2003 7:06 pm.txt
Jeff TuckerOct 8, 2003 8:43 pm 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:[courier-users] Re: Courier-IMAP 2.1.2 uses tons of bandwidthActions...
From:Sam Varshavchik (mrs@courier-mta.com)
Date:Oct 4, 2003 6:26:40 pm
List:net.sourceforge.lists.courier-users

Jeff Tucker writes:

Am I correct in thinking that with the UIDL changing, the POP client will decide it doesn't know what messages have been downloaded and will download them all again? If that's the case, why is the UIDL from gamma different from the other two servers when each are logging in to the same account name and looking at the same exact files on the back end?

UIDL management changed in the 2.x series. When upgrading from 1.x, the existing UIDLs are preserved; but if you started with 2.1 and downgraded 1.x (which is essentially what you did, in your little experiment), the 1.x POP3 server did not understand 2.1's UIDLs, and assigned its own UIDLs.