atom feed22 messages in org.apache.tomcat.usersRe: (Issue) Tomcat 7.0.12 silent install
FromSent OnAttachments
John MarcinekApr 27, 2011 11:47 am 
Caldarale, Charles RApr 27, 2011 12:35 pm 
John MarcinekApr 27, 2011 1:39 pm 
Caldarale, Charles RApr 27, 2011 1:54 pm 
Mark ThomasApr 27, 2011 2:26 pm 
John...@pb.comApr 28, 2011 4:21 am 
John...@pb.comApr 28, 2011 4:25 am 
Mark ThomasApr 28, 2011 9:04 am 
Caldarale, Charles RApr 28, 2011 9:14 am 
Caldarale, Charles RApr 28, 2011 9:16 am 
John...@pb.comApr 28, 2011 11:48 am 
Caldarale, Charles RApr 28, 2011 12:04 pm 
Mark ThomasApr 28, 2011 12:06 pm 
John...@pb.comApr 28, 2011 12:14 pm 
John...@pb.comApr 28, 2011 12:25 pm 
Konstantin KolinkoApr 28, 2011 1:22 pm 
Terence M. BandoianApr 28, 2011 1:33 pm 
John...@pb.comApr 28, 2011 1:34 pm 
Konstantin KolinkoApr 28, 2011 1:45 pm 
John...@pb.comApr 28, 2011 2:25 pm 
Konstantin KolinkoApr 28, 2011 3:00 pm 
John...@pb.comApr 29, 2011 5:32 am 
Subject:Re: (Issue) Tomcat 7.0.12 silent install
From:Mark Thomas (mar@apache.org)
Date:Apr 27, 2011 2:26:55 pm
List:org.apache.tomcat.users

On 27/04/2011 21:55, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:

From: John Marcinek [mailto:John@pb.com] Subject: RE: (Issue) Tomcat 7.0.12 silent install

I've been installing the 32-bit version of Tomcat (sorry, don't think I mentioned that).

There is no 32-bit-only Windows service installer, but there are 32- or 64-bit
specific .zip files. Exactly which one are you using?

I'm a little puzzled as to why the 64-bit JVM is necessary since I was able to successfully install Tomcat 7.0 using the wizard

I suspect the silent installer just looks at the OS type and assumes the JVM
matches, but I'm not positive about that.

The Windows installer is now smarter than that. It looks at the JVM, determines 32-bit or 64-bit and then installs the native binaries and service wrapper that match the JVM. If the installer can't find the JVM then things could go wrong. You'd have to check the nsis script to see how JVM detection is done - I don't recall off-hand.

Mark