atom feed75 messages in at.iem.pd-listRe: [PD] PDDP meeting?
FromSent OnAttachments
Hans-Christoph SteinerApr 18, 2006 4:34 pm 
Mark PolishookApr 18, 2006 6:23 pm 
dafydd hughesApr 18, 2006 9:33 pm 
Koray TahirogluApr 18, 2006 11:32 pm 
adam armfieldApr 19, 2006 6:43 am 
derek holzerApr 19, 2006 8:07 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerApr 19, 2006 4:20 pm 
David PowersApr 20, 2006 10:40 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerApr 21, 2006 1:34 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerApr 21, 2006 1:36 am 
adamApr 21, 2006 3:23 am 
adamApr 21, 2006 3:48 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigApr 21, 2006 4:49 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigApr 21, 2006 5:45 am 
Koray TahirogluApr 21, 2006 5:57 am 
B. BogartApr 21, 2006 8:15 am 
dafydd hughesApr 21, 2006 8:24 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerApr 22, 2006 11:04 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerApr 22, 2006 11:06 am 
adamApr 23, 2006 10:13 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerApr 25, 2006 9:06 am 
derek holzerApr 25, 2006 11:49 am 
David PowersApr 25, 2006 12:33 pm 
day 5Apr 25, 2006 12:39 pm 
João Miguel PaisApr 26, 2006 1:26 am.txt
adamApr 26, 2006 3:06 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerApr 26, 2006 3:24 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerApr 26, 2006 3:29 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerApr 26, 2006 3:30 am 
David PowersApr 26, 2006 12:48 pm 
day 5Apr 26, 2006 1:53 pm 
Hans-Christoph SteinerApr 26, 2006 2:20 pm 
s.koepfApr 26, 2006 2:42 pm 
Mathieu BouchardApr 28, 2006 4:13 pm 
Mathieu BouchardApr 30, 2006 9:58 am 
Tim BlechmannApr 30, 2006 10:26 am 
Mathieu BouchardApr 30, 2006 10:33 am 
Mathieu BouchardApr 30, 2006 10:39 am 
Chris McCormickApr 30, 2006 6:21 pm 
Mathieu BouchardMay 1, 2006 7:36 am 
Chris McCormickMay 1, 2006 6:37 pm 
Mathieu BouchardMay 1, 2006 8:17 pm 
Mathieu BouchardMay 1, 2006 9:13 pm 
Chris McCormickMay 1, 2006 10:47 pm 
Mathieu BouchardMay 5, 2006 1:34 pm 
Arie van SchutterhoefMay 5, 2006 1:56 pm 
Mathieu BouchardMay 5, 2006 2:12 pm 
Tim BlechmannMay 5, 2006 2:35 pm 
day 5May 5, 2006 4:55 pm 
Frank BarknechtMay 6, 2006 1:18 am 
Chris McCormickMay 6, 2006 5:56 am 
Arie van SchutterhoefMay 6, 2006 6:35 am 
Mathieu BouchardMay 6, 2006 11:37 am 
Mathieu BouchardMay 6, 2006 11:42 am 
Mathieu BouchardMay 6, 2006 11:56 am 
Mathieu BouchardMay 6, 2006 12:39 pm 
Arie van SchutterhoefMay 6, 2006 1:25 pm 
Frank BarknechtMay 6, 2006 3:09 pm 
Mathieu BouchardMay 6, 2006 4:56 pm 
Arie van SchutterhoefMay 6, 2006 5:41 pm 
geigerMay 7, 2006 6:15 am 
Mathieu BouchardMay 7, 2006 12:22 pm 
Arie van SchutterhoefMay 7, 2006 3:14 pm 
Chris McCormickMay 7, 2006 6:24 pm 
Chris McCormickMay 7, 2006 6:51 pm 
Mathieu BouchardMay 7, 2006 8:37 pm 
geigerMay 8, 2006 3:20 am 
geigerMay 8, 2006 3:28 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerMay 8, 2006 6:21 am 
Krzysztof CzajaMay 8, 2006 4:58 pm 
Mathieu BouchardMay 8, 2006 10:51 pm 
Frank BarknechtMay 9, 2006 12:42 am 
SteffenMay 14, 2006 4:01 am 
B. BogartAug 26, 2006 10:45 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerAug 26, 2006 11:04 am 
Subject:Re: [PD] PDDP meeting?
From:Arie van Schutterhoef (ars@xs4all.nl)
Date:May 6, 2006 1:25:33 pm
List:at.iem.pd-list

jMax's problems were even worse than what you say. The messagesystem (which we used for video) couldn't run clickfree either, with hiccups longer than 100 ms! and i'm not sure that they were fixable by adding an extra CPU.

-There is a big misunderstanding about the purpose for what jMax was designed in the first place: a replacement for the Ircam Signal Processing Workstation a.k.a ISPW. Period. At that time approx. 1991-1995 signal processing meant in their terminology: audio-processing. This was done previously with dedicated processors:DSP's. Subsequently it became possibleto this with general CPU's like PPC, MIPS, UltraSparc. etc., etc., etc... Intel had a lousy reputation in this. They later on discovered there was a market for this so up comes MMX, SSE...

IRCAM wanted a 'virtual ISPW' and found this at that time in SGI machines with multiple cpu's and the OS (Irix) that offered, through the REACT extensions, an adequate realtime response (under 20 milliseconds...), hence jMax. Therefore the controlling host became a Java-gui on cpu 1 and all the signal processing stuff were put on other cpu's. Now under Irix you can assign these functions to different processors, because REACT allows you to do so. Thus if you wanted to do video use a separate processor!

However one can question whether it was a clever thing to do this seperation, on the other hand with current dualcore processors becoming standard for the next couple of years, maybe it ought to be revived. Perhaps somebody ought to contact Francois Dechelle in advance.. I think, by the way, IRCAM could have supported it slightly more decently with their lists.

AvS

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .....................................................................

` |Schreck Ensemble . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . +

` |# -laboratory for live electro-acoustic music- # | | http://www.schreck.nl/ | | http://www.xs4all.nl/~schreck/ | ` *===========================================================++ ` |Compositions http://www.xs4all.nl/~schreck/html/compo.html | ` |Samples http://www.xs4all.nl/~schreck/html/samp.html | ` |Patches http://www.xs4all.nl/~schreck/html/pat.html | ` |Videos http://www.xs4all.nl/~schreck/html/video.html |

` |Scores http://www.xs4all.nl/~schreck/html/scores.html |