38 messages in net.nether.puck.cisco-nsp[c-nsp] VLSM
FromSent OnAttachments
ShaunJan 10, 2005 4:53 pm 
Gert DoeringJan 10, 2005 5:26 pm 
Stephen J. WilcoxJan 10, 2005 5:27 pm 
matthew zeierJan 10, 2005 5:46 pm 
ShaunJan 10, 2005 6:19 pm 
Michael SmithJan 10, 2005 6:26 pm 
Stephen J. WilcoxJan 10, 2005 6:28 pm 
lis...@hojmark.orgJan 10, 2005 6:55 pm 
Brant I. StevensJan 10, 2005 11:25 pm 
Gert DoeringJan 11, 2005 2:33 am 
Stephen J. WilcoxJan 11, 2005 6:11 am 
Mark PersikoJan 11, 2005 10:49 am 
Gert DoeringJan 11, 2005 11:22 am 
Hudson Delbert J Contr 61 CS/SCBNJan 11, 2005 12:11 pm 
Brant I. StevensJan 11, 2005 12:45 pm 
Pete TemplinJan 11, 2005 12:52 pm 
Stephen J. WilcoxJan 11, 2005 1:30 pm 
Stephen J. WilcoxJan 11, 2005 1:39 pm 
Pete TemplinJan 11, 2005 2:09 pm 
Gert DoeringJan 11, 2005 2:47 pm 
Gert DoeringJan 11, 2005 2:48 pm 
matthew zeierJan 11, 2005 3:09 pm 
lis...@hojmark.orgJan 11, 2005 5:22 pm 
Anson RinesmithJan 11, 2005 5:47 pm 
Michael LoftisJan 11, 2005 5:57 pm 
Stephen J. WilcoxJan 11, 2005 7:23 pm 
Stephen J. WilcoxJan 11, 2005 7:37 pm 
ShaunJan 11, 2005 8:31 pm 
Jon LewisJan 11, 2005 9:48 pm 
Majid FaridJan 12, 2005 12:24 am 
matthew zeierJan 12, 2005 1:23 am 
Ted MittelstaedtJan 12, 2005 1:41 am 
Ted MittelstaedtJan 12, 2005 1:44 am 
Ted MittelstaedtJan 12, 2005 1:51 am 
lis...@hojmark.orgJan 12, 2005 1:18 pm 
lis...@hojmark.orgJan 12, 2005 1:30 pm 
ShaunJan 13, 2005 4:05 am 
Ted MittelstaedtJan 14, 2005 12:29 am 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:[c-nsp] VLSMActions...
From:Stephen J. Wilcox (ste@telecomplete.co.uk)
Date:Jan 11, 2005 7:23:39 pm
List:net.nether.puck.cisco-nsp

On Tue, 11 Jan 2005, Pete Templin wrote:

Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:

you are correct tho, the semantics is perhaps unimportant, but generally use of incorrect terminology also means their understanding of the actual networking is incorrect too.

Bingo!

When people assume they can have a /24 (formerly known as class C) automatically with a T1 because that's how the Internet worked years (decade?) ago, it becomes a problem. (Or when they think that address assignments are linear with bandwidth, etc.)

its worse than that, its apparent that the reason some deaggreate clumps of /24s exist in the global routing table is because they eg got a /20 but interpreted it as 16 x Class C so they announce 16x Class C and configure 16 secondary addresses on their routers!

Steve