

![]() | Start a set with this search |
![]() | Include this search in one of my sets |
![]() | Exclude this search from one of my sets |
![]() | Permalink to these results Paste this link in email or IM: |
| Atom feed for tracking future search results Paste this URL into your reader: |
38 messages in net.nether.puck.cisco-nsp[c-nsp] VLSM| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Shaun | Jan 10, 2005 4:53 pm | |
| Gert Doering | Jan 10, 2005 5:26 pm | |
| Stephen J. Wilcox | Jan 10, 2005 5:27 pm | |
| matthew zeier | Jan 10, 2005 5:46 pm | |
| Shaun | Jan 10, 2005 6:19 pm | |
| Michael Smith | Jan 10, 2005 6:26 pm | |
| Stephen J. Wilcox | Jan 10, 2005 6:28 pm | |
| lis...@hojmark.org | Jan 10, 2005 6:55 pm | |
| Brant I. Stevens | Jan 10, 2005 11:25 pm | |
| Gert Doering | Jan 11, 2005 2:33 am | |
| Stephen J. Wilcox | Jan 11, 2005 6:11 am | |
| Mark Persiko | Jan 11, 2005 10:49 am | |
| Gert Doering | Jan 11, 2005 11:22 am | |
| Hudson Delbert J Contr 61 CS/SCBN | Jan 11, 2005 12:11 pm | |
| Brant I. Stevens | Jan 11, 2005 12:45 pm | |
| Pete Templin | Jan 11, 2005 12:52 pm | |
| Stephen J. Wilcox | Jan 11, 2005 1:30 pm | |
| Stephen J. Wilcox | Jan 11, 2005 1:39 pm | |
| Pete Templin | Jan 11, 2005 2:09 pm | |
| Gert Doering | Jan 11, 2005 2:47 pm | |
| Gert Doering | Jan 11, 2005 2:48 pm | |
| matthew zeier | Jan 11, 2005 3:09 pm | |
| lis...@hojmark.org | Jan 11, 2005 5:22 pm | |
| Anson Rinesmith | Jan 11, 2005 5:47 pm | |
| Michael Loftis | Jan 11, 2005 5:57 pm | |
| Stephen J. Wilcox | Jan 11, 2005 7:23 pm | |
| Stephen J. Wilcox | Jan 11, 2005 7:37 pm | |
| Shaun | Jan 11, 2005 8:31 pm | |
| Jon Lewis | Jan 11, 2005 9:48 pm | |
| Majid Farid | Jan 12, 2005 12:24 am | |
| matthew zeier | Jan 12, 2005 1:23 am | |
| Ted Mittelstaedt | Jan 12, 2005 1:41 am | |
| Ted Mittelstaedt | Jan 12, 2005 1:44 am | |
| Ted Mittelstaedt | Jan 12, 2005 1:51 am | |
| lis...@hojmark.org | Jan 12, 2005 1:18 pm | |
| lis...@hojmark.org | Jan 12, 2005 1:30 pm | |
| Shaun | Jan 13, 2005 4:05 am | |
| Ted Mittelstaedt | Jan 14, 2005 12:29 am |

![]() | Permalink for this message Paste this link in email or IM: |
![]() | Permalink for this thread Paste this link in email or IM: |
| Atom feed for this thread Paste this URL into your reader: |
| Subject: | [c-nsp] VLSM | Actions... |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Stephen J. Wilcox (ste...@telecomplete.co.uk) | |
| Date: | Jan 11, 2005 7:23:39 pm | |
| List: | net.nether.puck.cisco-nsp | |
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005, Pete Templin wrote:
Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:
you are correct tho, the semantics is perhaps unimportant, but generally use of incorrect terminology also means their understanding of the actual networking is incorrect too.
Bingo!
When people assume they can have a /24 (formerly known as class C) automatically with a T1 because that's how the Internet worked years (decade?) ago, it becomes a problem. (Or when they think that address assignments are linear with bandwidth, etc.)
its worse than that, its apparent that the reason some deaggreate clumps of /24s exist in the global routing table is because they eg got a /20 but interpreted it as 16 x Class C so they announce 16x Class C and configure 16 secondary addresses on their routers!
Steve







