12 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-hackersFreeBSD 6.1 Released| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Scott Long | May 9, 2006 3:19 am | |
| Julian Elischer | May 9, 2006 4:49 am | |
| Mike Jakubik | May 9, 2006 11:31 am | |
| Simon L. Nielsen | May 11, 2006 9:38 pm | |
| Simon L. Nielsen | May 12, 2006 1:52 am | |
| Mark Kirkwood | May 12, 2006 2:31 am | |
| Mike Jakubik | May 12, 2006 2:33 am | |
| Jonathan Noack | May 12, 2006 3:48 am | |
| Mike Jakubik | May 12, 2006 3:49 am | |
| Scott Long | May 12, 2006 5:22 am | |
| Avleen Vig | May 12, 2006 6:58 am | |
| J. T. farmer | May 12, 2006 12:45 pm |
| Subject: | FreeBSD 6.1 Released | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Avleen Vig (list...@silverwraith.com) | |
| Date: | May 12, 2006 6:58:54 am | |
| List: | org.freebsd.freebsd-hackers | |
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 11:42:26PM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote:
The *entire* errata page was from 6.0; it was a mistake. This wasn't some "put on the rose-colored classes and gloss over major issues" thing. It was a long release cycle and something was forgotten. C'est la vie. It's always a good idea to check the most up-to-date version of the errata page on the web anyway, so it's *not* too late to update it.
How convenient. These problems needed to be addressed in the release notes, not some on line version.
If they're THAT big of a deal, learn some C, and fix the problems yourself, instead of sending e-mails that sound rude and ungrateful.
And if you can't do that, how about helping scott put together release notes which you seemed to think were so awful?
All I hear from you is complaining and a serious lack of anything constructive.