On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 11:42:26PM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote:
The *entire* errata page was from 6.0; it was a mistake. This wasn't
some "put on the rose-colored classes and gloss over major issues"
thing. It was a long release cycle and something was forgotten. C'est
la vie. It's always a good idea to check the most up-to-date version of
the errata page on the web anyway, so it's *not* too late to update it.
How convenient. These problems needed to be addressed in the release
notes, not some on line version.
If they're THAT big of a deal, learn some C, and fix the problems
yourself, instead of sending e-mails that sound rude and ungrateful.
And if you can't do that, how about helping scott put together release
notes which you seemed to think were so awful?
All I hear from you is complaining and a serious lack of anything