17 messages in net.clamav.lists.clamav-win32Re: [clamav-win32] Question regarding...
FromSent OnAttachments
Pandu PoluanJul 10, 2008 10:52 pm 
Nigel HorneJul 11, 2008 1:55 am 
Pandu PoluanJul 11, 2008 3:08 am 
Gianluigi TiesiJul 11, 2008 4:34 am 
SarocetJul 12, 2008 4:06 am 
Nigel HorneJul 17, 2008 12:54 am 
Robert WolfeJul 18, 2008 6:24 am 
Gianluigi TiesiJul 18, 2008 6:52 am 
Pandu PoluanAug 11, 2008 2:56 am 
Nigel HorneAug 11, 2008 3:13 am 
Pandu PoluanAug 11, 2008 3:13 am 
Geoff PartridgeAug 11, 2008 4:50 am 
Reza Mochamad DiannagaraAug 11, 2008 5:22 am 
Brielle BrunsAug 11, 2008 12:58 pm 
Geoff PartridgeAug 11, 2008 12:59 pm 
Pandu PoluanAug 12, 2008 12:49 am 
Brielle BrunsAug 12, 2008 6:59 am 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:Re: [clamav-win32] Question regarding using libclamavActions...
From:Pandu Poluan (pan@poluan.info)
Date:Aug 11, 2008 3:13:42 am
List:net.clamav.lists.clamav-win32

Oh, some additional information:

- PCMAV is publicly distributed through a freeware magazine, but it does not include libclamav binaries in its distribution (source code of PCMAV *and* libclamav are also not distributed) - According to the instructions, there is no option to enable/disable libclamav integration; if PCMAV finds libclamav files in its directory, it will use them.

Again, thank you for your help.

Rgds,

{p}

Okay, thanks for the pointer.

Problem is, I am not the programmer of the program in question. But the issue of whether the program violates the GPL or not is still a polemic in my place.

The program is called PCMAV, and the program can be downloaded here: (each link a different version of the program) http://rapidshare.com/files/130842014/PCMAV-1.5.zip http://rapidshare.com/files/123822011/PCMAV-1.4.zip http://rapidshare.com/files/116129695/PCMAV-1.3.zip http://rapidshare.com/files/109574110/PCMAV-1.2.zip

The program is a freeware, *but* does not use GPL.

Now, based on the instructions here: (in Indonesian language, I'll explain below)

http://maseko.com/2007/09/21/pcmav-kenali-lebih-banyak-virus-dengan-library-clamav-09x/

In essence, the instructions say: To integrate PCMAV with ClamAV, all you have to do is to copy the files libclamav.dll, libclamunrar.dll and libclamunrar_iface.dll, along with the latest databases main.cvd and daily.cvd into the same folder where PCMAV is installed.

Now, we are at an impasse; some say PCMAV is violating the GPL. Others say it is not. Based on the above, what's your take on PCMAV?

I hope to have a definitive answer so that we can put the question to rest.

Thank you for your help.

Rgds,

{p}

On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 2:54 PM, Nigel Horne <nj@bandsman.co.uk> wrote:

Pandu Poluan wrote:

My question is: If I create a program that can *optionally* use

libclamav, must that program be GPL-licensed as well?

The short answer is "no", there is no obligation for the new program to be licensed under the GPL. The creation of a program that optionally makes function calls to a program licensed under the GPL should not create an obligation to distribute the new program under the GPL.

Come to Las Vegas to see the latest in Sourcefire and open source innovation. Register at www.bossconference.com by September 30th to save $200!