32 messages in com.googlegroups.pylons-discussRe: Auth and Auth| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Yannick Gingras | 27 Mar 2008 07:44 | |
| Ian Bicking | 27 Mar 2008 09:01 | |
| Wolverine | 27 Mar 2008 09:42 | |
| Eric Ongerth | 27 Mar 2008 19:56 | |
| Dalius Dobravolskas | 27 Mar 2008 23:01 | |
| Dalius Dobravolskas | 27 Mar 2008 23:42 | |
| chrism | 28 Mar 2008 09:38 | |
| chrism | 28 Mar 2008 10:07 | |
| Chris AtLee | 28 Mar 2008 11:04 | |
| Mike Orr | 28 Mar 2008 13:48 | |
| Ian Bicking | 28 Mar 2008 14:55 | |
| Jorge Vargas | 28 Mar 2008 21:12 | |
| Mike Orr | 28 Mar 2008 22:19 | |
| Wichert Akkerman | 29 Mar 2008 03:44 | |
| lasizoillo | 29 Mar 2008 07:50 | |
| Dalius Dobravolskas | 29 Mar 2008 10:16 | |
| Dalius Dobravolskas | 29 Mar 2008 10:27 | |
| Dalius Dobravolskas | 29 Mar 2008 10:29 | |
| Dalius Dobravolskas | 29 Mar 2008 10:35 | |
| mdoudoroff | 29 Mar 2008 16:23 | |
| Mike Orr | 29 Mar 2008 20:36 | |
| Ian Bicking | 30 Mar 2008 11:56 | |
| Ross Vandegrift | 30 Mar 2008 12:05 | |
| Ross Vandegrift | 30 Mar 2008 12:08 | |
| Dalius Dobravolskas | 30 Mar 2008 22:36 | |
| Dalius Dobravolskas | 31 Mar 2008 04:21 | |
| Chris Shenton | 31 Mar 2008 08:24 | |
| Mike Orr | 31 Mar 2008 11:16 | |
| Dalius Dobravolskas | 01 Apr 2008 13:16 | |
| Ian Bicking | 01 Apr 2008 13:58 | |
| johnnyice | 16 Apr 2008 08:38 | |
| Eric Ongerth | 16 Apr 2008 18:27 |
| Subject: | Re: Auth and Auth![]() |
|---|---|
| From: | Dalius Dobravolskas (dali...@public.gmane.org) |
| Date: | 03/29/2008 10:16:20 AM |
| List: | com.googlegroups.pylons-discuss |
Jorge Vargas wrote:
this comes as a shock to me, I though authkit was defacto just like mako, SA,etc. I'm just starting to read up on authkit, and so far I though it only had outdated documentation, but the fact that noone has back it up as a good path in this thread makes me wonder if I'm doing the right thing. Could someone summarize or point to a summary of the common issues people have with authkit? as for repoze how ready are you? will I have to work of trunk?
I personally think that AuthKit is great peace of software but I just don't like some aspects of it:
1) OpenID handler is bad:
a) To make login expire after two days you must set that in two places. That's bad design.
b) I don't like the way AuthKit handles database with OpenID but I don't have better solution yet either :-(
c) There are problem with AuthKit OpenID handler you are not even aware yet about.
2) I don't like the idea that AuhtKit tries to display login and other pages itself (either through template or function call). OK - you can pass callback function but that's not solution for me either.
From other side AuthKit *authorization* side is just pure gold.
That's why I offer splitting AuthKit into independent parts.
Regards, Dalius
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"pylons-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to
pylons-discuss-/JYPx...@public.gmane.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
pylons-discuss-unsubscribe-/JYPx...@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---




