Re: Distro packaging decisions and the non-public Enterprise source - Jeremy Cole - com.mysql.lists.packagers

25 messages in com.mysql.lists.packagersRe: Distro packaging decisions and th...

From	Sent On	Attachments
Robin H. Johnson	09 Sep 2007 22:05
Joerg Bruehe	10 Sep 2007 02:08
Robin H. Johnson	10 Sep 2007 17:33
Michael Shigorin	11 Sep 2007 05:16
Michael Shigorin	11 Sep 2007 05:22
Jeremy Cole	11 Sep 2007 09:39
Colin Charles	18 Sep 2007 08:45
Colin Charles	18 Sep 2007 08:57
Colin Charles	18 Sep 2007 09:12
Michael Shigorin	18 Sep 2007 10:15
Michael Shigorin	18 Sep 2007 10:17
Colin Charles	18 Sep 2007 14:02
Jeremy Cole	18 Sep 2007 16:17
Jeremy Cole	18 Sep 2007 16:28
Colin Charles	19 Sep 2007 01:48
Colin Charles	19 Sep 2007 01:51
Robin H. Johnson	19 Sep 2007 02:26
Robin H. Johnson	19 Sep 2007 05:25
Robin H. Johnson	19 Sep 2007 06:18
Michael Shigorin	19 Sep 2007 14:10
Jeremy Cole	20 Sep 2007 01:33
Joerg Bruehe	20 Sep 2007 02:03
Joerg Bruehe	20 Sep 2007 02:03
Cristian Gafton	20 Sep 2007 20:47
Cristian Gafton	20 Sep 2007 22:20

Subject:	Re: Distro packaging decisions and the non-public Enterprise source
From:	Jeremy Cole (jer...@provenscaling.com)
Date:	09/18/2007 04:28:15 PM
List:	com.mysql.lists.packagers

Hi Colin,

Yes, this has been brought up, and everything you've mentioned before has also been brought up. Our canned answer for this is that the internal server QA processes have improved tremendously, and there are many many test cases and an impressive test suite, hence MySQL has decided to try a "reverse Enterprise" model

Oh come on. *Just today* another incident has caught my attention which shows a lack of QA for basic things: 5.0.48 was pulled because of a stupid bug which should have been caught in basic QA. You may be ready to call the community unnecessary for QA, but I am not.

Regards,

Jeremy