--- Timothy Wall <twa...@users.sf.net> wrote:
On Jul 29, 2007, at 8:52 AM, Michael Hall wrote:
It would seem to me that a dynamic load should
search
on a symbol and not be tied to a specific absolute
path library but I could be wrong. Not that
familiar
with that stuff.
The jnilib is linked against JAWT. The library and
symbols *could*
be looked up dynamically via dlopen/dlsym, but it's
a much bigger
pain that way.
It would actually be dynamic that way I'd think but
again this is not really the sort of platform where
I've spent most of my time. IBM mainframe you have a
system defined search path for dynamic loads, some
standard libs, some can be varied by the system
programmers, and you find it in those or don't. There
is no reference to any kind of file for the dynamic
load even the ones that are always there.
/Users/twall/Development/ws/jna/build/native/libjnidispatch.jnilib
That shouldn't be there. Where exactly did it show
up?
The JWS ppc darwin download, extracted and issued the
command.
It might work if it's not a symlink (which it
usually is); you'd want
the path to be the current JRE, though, not the
current JDK (unless
the JDK is always installed by default, which I
doubt).
For OS X the JDK is always installed and I think for
OS X this symlink is always there too. But it is a
symlink so if thats the problem it won't help. Between
the two symlinks there might be differences depending
on whether or not you start tweaking the preferred
version using the java preferences application. I
don't know. But either way I think, a symlink.
11 messages in net.java.dev.jna.usersRe: [jna-users] Java 5 dependency on OSX
