| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Rowan | Feb 22, 2009 2:48 am | |
| Christopher Swift | Feb 22, 2009 3:42 am | |
| Christopher Swift | Feb 22, 2009 3:43 am | |
| James Thomas | Feb 22, 2009 3:44 am | |
| Rowan | Feb 22, 2009 4:01 am | |
| Rowan | Feb 24, 2009 12:47 am | |
| Thomas Ibbotson | Feb 24, 2009 8:57 am | |
| Christopher Swift | Feb 24, 2009 8:58 am | |
| Rowan | Feb 24, 2009 9:14 am | |
| Rowan | Feb 24, 2009 11:53 am | |
| Matthew Daubney | Feb 24, 2009 12:56 pm | |
| Rowan | Feb 24, 2009 1:02 pm | |
| Jon Reynolds | Feb 25, 2009 7:19 am | |
| Rowan | Feb 25, 2009 7:39 am | |
| Rob Beard | Feb 25, 2009 8:08 am | |
| Tony Travis | Feb 25, 2009 9:21 am | |
| Rowan | Feb 25, 2009 9:40 am | |
| Rowan | Mar 1, 2009 8:02 pm | |
| Sean Miller | Mar 1, 2009 11:44 pm | |
| Rowan | Mar 1, 2009 11:58 pm | |
| Sean Miller | Mar 2, 2009 12:08 am | |
| Rowan | Mar 2, 2009 12:18 am | |
| Alan Pope | Mar 2, 2009 12:37 am | |
| Rowan | Mar 2, 2009 12:49 am | |
| Alan Pope | Mar 2, 2009 12:54 am | |
| Rowan | Mar 2, 2009 12:58 am | |
| Rowan | Mar 2, 2009 1:13 am | |
| Alan Pope | Mar 2, 2009 1:24 am | |
| Rowan | Mar 2, 2009 1:39 am | |
| Rowan | Mar 2, 2009 2:06 am | |
| Rowan | Mar 2, 2009 5:59 am | |
| Alan Pope | Mar 2, 2009 6:39 am | |
| Rowan | Mar 2, 2009 6:49 am | |
| Rowan | Mar 2, 2009 6:53 am | |
| Alan Pope | Mar 2, 2009 7:07 am | |
| Rowan | Mar 2, 2009 7:23 am | |
| Tony Travis | Mar 2, 2009 7:23 am | |
| Rowan | Mar 2, 2009 7:30 am | |
| Tony Travis | Mar 2, 2009 7:31 am | |
| Rowan | Mar 2, 2009 7:41 am | |
| Alan Pope | Mar 2, 2009 7:58 am | |
| Rowan | Mar 2, 2009 8:35 am | |
| Tony Travis | Mar 2, 2009 8:47 am | |
| Alan Pope | Mar 2, 2009 8:55 am | |
| Rowan | Mar 2, 2009 9:11 am |
| Subject: | Re: [ubuntu-uk] Non-default driver | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Alan Pope (al...@popey.com) | |
| Date: | Mar 2, 2009 1:24:02 am | |
| List: | com.ubuntu.lists.ubuntu-uk | |
2009/3/2 Rowan <rowa...@googlemail.com>:
One, the thing already installed some of the auto-updates, then got stuck, because it had disabled the interface and couldn't download the rest, so I shall have to tell it to stop complaining about this fact until I am sorted.
Yes, the instructions that Sean and LC provided should get you back online. Of course you could then install more updates that break it again, and so you'd need to go through the procedure again. It should take only about 1 min once you have got your head around the commands.
Two, in fact, it appears the machine was not purpose designed, with or without "bleeding edge chipsets" (lovely phrase!) - it was designed and built in Japan to run Vista, and these LinuxCertified people just rebranded it.
Pretty much all laptops these days are "designed for vista", and most linux vendors simply buy those laptops and rebrand/reinstall on them to get a more acceptable solution.
Of course things are getting better. Canonical and others are testing hardware and providing feedback both to western distributors/manufacturers and the original equipment manufacturers in the far east. Things are a lot better these days than they were a few years ago.
Some of us were in a Sony store recently and one person put a bootable Ubuntu linux USB stick in one of the display Sony laptops. It booted up and everything we tested worked, straight out of the box. Now I'm not saying everyone should go out and buy Sony kit, but in the past Sony laptops had been somewhat troublesome in getting working in Linux. To be able to boot one off a usb stick (or CD/DVD) in a store and find _everything_ work is quite a mean feat. I'd say it's only going to get better as companies like Canonical, Novell and Red Hat test and certify kit.
But then I'm a "glass half full" kinda guy.
Cheers, Al.





