10 messages in com.perforce.jamming[jamming] Multiple Depnedants and ord...| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Mikl...@mac.com | 10 Jan 2001 08:56 | |
| Amau...@atsm.fr Amaury.FORGEOTDARC@atsm.fr | 10 Jan 2001 10:05 | |
| Dave...@vignette.com | 10 Jan 2001 10:24 | |
| Dave...@vignette.com | 10 Jan 2001 11:08 | |
| =?is...@mac.com | 10 Jan 2001 13:00 | |
| Amau...@atsm.fr Amaury.FORGEOTDARC@atsm.fr | 11 Jan 2001 00:38 | |
| Amau...@atsm.fr Amaury.FORGEOTDARC@atsm.fr | 11 Jan 2001 01:47 | |
| Mikl...@mac.com | 11 Jan 2001 03:07 | |
| Amau...@atsm.fr Amaury.FORGEOTDARC@atsm.fr | 11 Jan 2001 03:32 | |
| Arnt...@trolltech.com | 11 Jan 2001 04:13 |
| Subject: | [jamming] Multiple Depnedants and order of actions.![]() |
|---|---|
| From: | Dave...@vignette.com (Dave...@vignette.com) |
| Date: | 01/10/2001 11:08:47 AM |
| List: | com.perforce.jamming |
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 20:04:40 +0100
> From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <ar...@trolltech.com>
> Cc: bo...@mac.com, jamm...@perforce.com
> References: <006401c07b26$57d47910$b906...@graphisoft.hu>
<2001...@medusa.vignette.com>
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
>
> Dave Lewis <dle...@vignette.com>
> > my experience is that outside of dependencies, there is no specific
> > order that actions will occur in. Logically, if there are no
> > dependencies, then it will not matter...
>
> Well, logic aside, it matters. I want the file I was just editing to be
> compiled first, because that's the file I'm thinking about right now.
well, in that case, just ask it to update that target instead of all of them.
> > Some file has to be the first to be compiled, and the one I'm currently > working on and saved just before I started jam is better than a random > choice. Often not _much_ better, but I personally really hate it when I > 'p4 sync' and the next time I compile, I have to wait a minute or two to > see the errors for the file I'm working on. > > --Arnt >
Well, I suppose somebody could do a newest first sort of ordering on top of equally choosable targets...
dave




