10 messages in com.perforce.jamming[jamming] Multiple Depnedants and ord...
FromSent OnAttachments
Mikl...@mac.com10 Jan 2001 08:56 
Amau...@atsm.fr Amaury.FORGEOTDARC@atsm.fr10 Jan 2001 10:05 
Dave...@vignette.com10 Jan 2001 10:24 
Dave...@vignette.com10 Jan 2001 11:08 
=?is...@mac.com10 Jan 2001 13:00 
Amau...@atsm.fr Amaury.FORGEOTDARC@atsm.fr11 Jan 2001 00:38 
Amau...@atsm.fr Amaury.FORGEOTDARC@atsm.fr11 Jan 2001 01:47 
Mikl...@mac.com11 Jan 2001 03:07 
Amau...@atsm.fr Amaury.FORGEOTDARC@atsm.fr11 Jan 2001 03:32 
Arnt...@trolltech.com11 Jan 2001 04:13 
Subject:[jamming] Multiple Depnedants and order of actions.
From:Dave...@vignette.com (Dave@vignette.com)
Date:01/10/2001 11:08:47 AM
List:com.perforce.jamming

Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 20:04:40 +0100

> From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <ar@trolltech.com> > Cc: bo@mac.com, jamm@perforce.com > References: <006401c07b26$57d47910$b906@graphisoft.hu>
<2001@medusa.vignette.com> > Mime-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Disposition: inline > > Dave Lewis <dle@vignette.com> > > my experience is that outside of dependencies, there is no specific > > order that actions will occur in. Logically, if there are no > > dependencies, then it will not matter... > > Well, logic aside, it matters. I want the file I was just editing to be > compiled first, because that's the file I'm thinking about right now.

well, in that case, just ask it to update that target instead of all of them.

> > Some file has to be the first to be compiled, and the one I'm currently > working on and saved just before I started jam is better than a random > choice. Often not _much_ better, but I personally really hate it when I > 'p4 sync' and the next time I compile, I have to wait a minute or two to > see the errors for the file I'm working on. > > --Arnt >

Well, I suppose somebody could do a newest first sort of ordering on top of equally choosable targets...

dave