34 messages in com.googlegroups.pylons-discussRe: cleaner "ToscaWidgets"| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Max Ischenko | 21 Oct 2007 23:39 | |
| Mike Orr | 22 Oct 2007 10:39 | |
| Max Ischenko | 22 Oct 2007 12:26 | |
| Alberto Valverde | 22 Oct 2007 13:06 | |
| Philip Cooper | 22 Oct 2007 14:10 | |
| Mike Orr | 22 Oct 2007 14:35 | |
| Alberto Valverde | 22 Oct 2007 15:26 | |
| Alberto Valverde | 22 Oct 2007 15:29 | |
| Mike Orr | 22 Oct 2007 15:59 | |
| Max Ischenko | 22 Oct 2007 21:56 | |
| Max Ischenko | 22 Oct 2007 21:59 | |
| Mike Orr | 23 Oct 2007 02:10 | |
| Mike Orr | 23 Oct 2007 02:13 | |
| Alberto Valverde | 23 Oct 2007 02:36 | |
| Alberto Valverde | 23 Oct 2007 02:41 | |
| Alberto Valverde | 23 Oct 2007 12:01 | |
| Mike Orr | 23 Oct 2007 16:21 | |
| Max Ischenko | 23 Oct 2007 21:47 | |
| Max Ischenko | 23 Oct 2007 21:50 | |
| Mike Orr | 23 Oct 2007 22:28 | |
| Ian Bicking | 23 Oct 2007 22:35 | |
| Max Ischenko | 23 Oct 2007 23:32 | |
| Ian Bicking | 24 Oct 2007 08:40 | |
| John_Nowlan | 24 Oct 2007 09:24 | |
| Alberto Valverde | 24 Oct 2007 10:24 | |
| Alberto Valverde | 24 Oct 2007 11:05 | |
| Ben Bangert | 24 Oct 2007 11:33 | |
| Alberto Valverde | 24 Oct 2007 11:46 | |
| Mike Orr | 24 Oct 2007 13:23 | |
| John_Nowlan | 24 Oct 2007 13:57 | |
| Alberto Valverde | 24 Oct 2007 15:06 | |
| Alberto Valverde | 24 Oct 2007 15:09 | |
| Matt Feifarek | 08 Nov 2007 13:38 | |
| Alberto Valverde | 10 Nov 2007 04:13 |
| Subject: | Re: cleaner "ToscaWidgets" |
|---|---|
| From: | Alberto Valverde (albe...@public.gmane.org) |
| Date: | 10/22/2007 01:06:47 PM |
| List: | com.googlegroups.pylons-discuss |
Max Ischenko wrote:
Hello Mike,
On 10/22/07, *Mike Orr* <slug...@public.gmane.org <mailto:slug...@public.gmane.org>> wrote:
So, to toscawidget or not to toscawidget? I'm about to write some forms soon. I was going to learn TW because I assumed it would be better in the long term when I add more Javascript features, and better to start with it now than to rewrite my forms in it later. Is TW really that bad? I don't care about a few extra dependencies as long as I know who's using them.
I'm obviously biased in regards to this so I hope a happy user chimes in instead of giving my opinion. :)
You 've got to use it for a while to make a judgement. It was a fine idea and I don't want to spread FUD. My problems with TW were:
- rough (random bugs)
I'd really appreciate some tickets at TG's trac to nail them.
- hard to use (basically no docs)
Fair enough. This is something I would really have liked to solve long ago but seems like some sort of mental blockade of mine. I've tried my best to personally give support in TW's mailing list to anyone needing help (secretly hoping users would fill the docs gap :) but experience has shown it's no substitute for real documentation. I hope to have time to change this soon.
- too complicated an implementation.
Ironically enough one of the reasons I spun TW out of TG's widgets was to simplify the implementation. I suspect the use of RuleDispatch greatly contributes to this perception, this is something I plan to change too. [1]
- development stalled
?? [2]
Regards, Alberto