11 messages in net.sourceforge.lists.courier-maildropRe: [maildropl] Re: filtering using b...
FromSent OnAttachments
PollywogDec 19, 2004 8:20 am 
PollywogDec 19, 2004 1:50 pm 
Thorsten HaudeDec 19, 2004 2:30 pm 
Thorsten HaudeDec 19, 2004 2:35 pm 
PollywogDec 19, 2004 2:47 pm 
Tony EarnshawDec 20, 2004 4:11 am 
PollywogDec 20, 2004 9:51 am 
Paul L. AllenDec 20, 2004 12:24 pm 
PollywogDec 20, 2004 12:31 pm 
Thorsten HaudeDec 21, 2004 4:33 pm 
PollywogDec 21, 2004 4:50 pm 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:Re: [maildropl] Re: filtering using body checksActions...
From:Thorsten Haude (list@thorstenhau.de)
Date:Dec 21, 2004 4:33:40 pm
List:net.sourceforge.lists.courier-maildrop

Hi,

* Paul L. Allen wrote (2004-12-20 21:24):

Pollywog writes:

I have looked at dspam

I hadn't heard of it until Tony mentioned it. Going by the claims it makes, it does a better job than spamassassin and doesn't need constant rule-tweaking to trap mutating words.

SA doesn't need constant rule-tweaking. Just feeding it any spam that gets through should keep it healthy.

Thorsten

-- When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle. - Edmund Burke