6 messages in com.mysql.lists.clusterRE: MySql Cluster Data Node Failure| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Waseem Azhar | 07 Jun 2007 07:09 | |
| Waseem Azhar | 07 Jun 2007 07:14 | |
| Jimmy Guerrero | 07 Jun 2007 07:25 | |
| Jon Stephens | 07 Jun 2007 08:58 | |
| Waseem Azhar | 08 Jun 2007 00:24 | |
| Sebastien LELIEVRE | 08 Jun 2007 00:31 |
| Subject: | RE: MySql Cluster Data Node Failure![]() |
|---|---|
| From: | Waseem Azhar (wase...@gmail.com) |
| Date: | 06/08/2007 12:24:04 AM |
| List: | com.mysql.lists.cluster |
Thank You. It was really helpful. I perfom a quick test and it worked.
I have another question, Does it make sense to have more than one Sql Nodes in a cluster. According to my understanding switching between sql nodes is not transparent to the client application. Do i need handle it myself in my client application ? or is there any mechanism exists where if one sql-node goes down the other take up the charge and remain transparent to the client.
Thanks, Azhar.
On 6/7/07, Jimmy Guerrero <jgue...@mysql.com> wrote:
Hello,
A data node failure should not bring down a cluster unless it is the last remaining node in a node group.
For example in a four data node cluster, with two replicas configured, you'd have two node groups comprised of two data nodes a piece.
- Node Group 0 * Data Node A * Data Node B
- Node Group 1 * Date Node C * Date Node D
In the above scenario you could loose Data Nodes A and C and still have a fully functional cluster as Data Nodes B and D hold the complete database when combined.
However, if you lost Data Nodes A and B, the cluster would shut down.
Thanks,
Jimmy Guerrero MySQL, Inc
Waseem Azhar wrote:
I have a question to the group .
What if one of my data node goes down for any reason (network connection etc..). Does it mean my whole cluster is down ? I am looking for the high availability but it seems increasing number of data node would increase the probability of failure.
Please advise. Azhar




