|Subject:||RE: [xri-editors] Feedback on rc1d|
|From:||Sakimura, Nat (n-sa...@nri.co.jp)|
|Date:||Nov 20, 2003 5:09:57 am|
Actually, since many identifier can actually point to the same thing, equivalence comparison at the identifier level is not that important for me :-)
-----Original Message----- From: Drummond Reed [mailto:drum...@onename.com] Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 4:12 AM To: Wachob, Gabe; Dave McAlpin; xri-...@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: RE: [xri-editors] Feedback on rc1d
-----Original Message----- From: Wachob, Gabe [mailto:gwac...@visa.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 10:59 AM To: 'Dave McAlpin'; Wachob, Gabe; xri-...@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: RE: [xri-editors] Feedback on rc1d
-----Original Message----- From: Dave McAlpin [mailto:dave...@epokinc.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 10:56 AM To: 'Wachob, Gabe'; xri-...@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: RE: [xri-editors] Feedback on rc1d Good, I wanted to rephrase that sentence anyway. Right now we have "Even though these rules are RECOMMENDED and not REQUIRED, an implementation that fails to observe them may experience an unacceptably high number of false negatives."
I'd like to change it to "To reduce the requirements on a minimally conforming processor, the majority of these rules are RECOMMENDED rather than REQUIRED. An implementation that fails to observe them, however, may frequently treat two XRIs as nonequal when in fact they are equal."
Does that sound ok?
dsr21: "may experience an unacceptably high numberof false negatives" - its not clear what "false negatives" means in this context. I would say "may frequently treat two XRIs as nonequal when if fact they are equal."
section 22.214.171.124 has a cross reference to section 0 - clearly this is wrong.
Nothing else jumps out at me - though I've focused mostly on changes. Reviewing old unchanged text tends to be less effective because of my familiarity with it. Things always slip by - time for more eyes!!!
To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xri-editors/membe rs/leave_workgroup.php.