on 4/12/05 12:30 AM, Brian Candler <B.Ca...@pobox.com> wrote:
On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 11:32:58PM -0700, Kurt Bigler wrote:
Just for the record, the SqWebMail makefiles apparently use CFLAGS, not
CCFLAGS.
I use CPPFLAGS.
That would have worked too, but I figured CPPFLAGS was intended for C++
compiles. But both get appended to the gcc command line by the Makefile, as
I recall.
I don't see any reference to "CCFLAGS" in the gcc info
documentation
I didn't realize it had anything to do with gcc itself. It seemed to be
just a matter of what macros the Makefile is using to contruct the gcc
command line.
- why did you think that CCFLAGS would work in the first
place?
It was taken directly from Sam's message (the one my message quoted). I
figured it was either a typo, or that the Makefile had changed since he
wrote the message. My intention was simply to correct the info for the
archives, since that is where I looked to solve my problem, and the
one-character difference caught me off-guard. I thought it might help the
next person who comes along and searches the archives for a solution to the
same problem.
But it occurs to me that it might be good if SqWebMail always compiled ok
with the default installation of courier-authlib without requiring special
configuration options. FWIW my system is FreeBSD 4.6.1.
I have my make working now, though. But I did lose an hour on this.
You can always cvsup your ports collection and install it through that.
Quite a lot of software does not look in /usr/local/include or
/usr/local/lib by default.
And you might want to consider an upgrade to 4.11 :-)
Ah, you mean half the pain twice as often? ;)
Anyway its a done deal. The new version looks very good and I'm glad I'm
fully up to date. Thanks to everyone for their good work and their support.
-Kurt
4 messages in net.sourceforge.lists.courier-sqwebmailRe: [sqwebmail] Re: courierauth.h mis...
