-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1

/ Togan Muftuoglu <tog...@users.sourceforge.net> was heard to say: | * Norman Walsh; <nd...@nwalsh.com> on 16 Oct, 2002 wrote: |>I'm personally quite unhappy with this proposal as it's written. It | | me too with what I see below :-) | |>adds five fairly general sounding element names (setup, scenario, |>task, objective, and solution) in a fairly narrow context. Experience |>suggests that this is too specific; it will work for some people, but |>it will spawn frequent requests for more flexibility and new |>special-purpose elements. | | Objective in my opionion is a higher level element. <module> | <moduleinfo> | <title></title> | <objective> | <orderedlist> | <listitem> </listitem> | <listitem> </listitem> | <</orderedlist> | </moduleinfo>

"Module" has awfully wide and varied connotations. What are you suggesting here? How does it relate to the 'exercise' markup discussion?

| ..... | | <exercise> | <exerciseinfo>...</exerciseinfo> | <exercisesection><title>Setup</title>... | <exercisesection><title>Scenario</title>... | <exercisesection><title>Task</title> | <exercisesection><title>Solution</title> | </exercise> | </module> | | How this sound to you ?

Be seeing you, norm

iD8DBQE9rYE5OyltUcwYWjsRArZ2AKChDfUFYhQ3adxIW1pnwmdlnniT3QCfd1MB aavlDm/u8yenSoTdPrZSJKY= =NSqw -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----