32 messages in net.sourceforge.lists.courier-maildrop[maildropl] Re: OpenBSD 3.2 breaks Co...
FromSent OnAttachments
Sam VarshavchikJan 13, 2003 3:46 pm 
D. J. BernsteinJan 13, 2003 6:11 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJan 13, 2003 9:11 pm 
Russell NelsonJan 13, 2003 9:46 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJan 13, 2003 10:19 pm 
Russell NelsonJan 13, 2003 11:11 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJan 13, 2003 11:35 pm 
mw-l...@csi.huJan 14, 2003 7:40 am 
Sam VarshavchikJan 14, 2003 3:22 pm 
mw-l...@csi.huJan 14, 2003 11:13 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJan 15, 2003 5:11 am 
Matthias AndreeJan 15, 2003 9:55 am 
Matthias AndreeJan 15, 2003 12:59 pm 
Matthias AndreeJan 15, 2003 1:36 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJan 15, 2003 3:11 pm 
Matthias AndreeJan 15, 2003 4:13 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJan 15, 2003 4:47 pm 
Johan LindhJan 15, 2003 10:16 pm 
Peter C. NortonJan 15, 2003 11:52 pm 
Bill MichellJan 16, 2003 1:30 am 
Johan LindhJan 16, 2003 2:00 am 
Bill MichellJan 16, 2003 2:28 am 
Matthias AndreeJan 16, 2003 2:28 am 
Matthias AndreeJan 16, 2003 2:45 am 
David LaightJan 16, 2003 3:14 am 
Sam VarshavchikJan 16, 2003 5:01 am 
Johan LindhJan 16, 2003 6:28 am 
Matthias AndreeJan 16, 2003 9:47 am 
mw-l...@csi.huJan 16, 2003 12:48 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJan 16, 2003 2:55 pm 
mw-l...@csi.huJan 17, 2003 12:30 pm 
Matthias AndreeJan 18, 2003 5:05 am 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:[maildropl] Re: OpenBSD 3.2 breaks Courier, Qmail.Actions...
From:Matthias Andree (matt@gmx.de)
Date:Jan 15, 2003 1:36:43 pm
List:net.sourceforge.lists.courier-maildrop

On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, Markus Stumpf wrote:

On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 09:59:34PM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote:

This won't work if applications move the new/ file away early, as has been pointed out.

If it's moved away there is no problem. It does not even exist, so it cannot be overwritten.

The problem strikes when stuff is moved from new/ to cur/ again, as has been shown for mutt (note this is also what DJB's reply about maildir_scan() was about). See my response to Felix.